We examine the information content of the call-put implied volatility spread (IVS) of Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF options. Empirically, the IVS significantly and negatively predicts future SSE50 ETF returns at both weekly and monthly horizons. This predictability is robust both in-sample and out-of-sample, which stands in contrast to prior evidence from the U.S. options market. We explore several potential explanations and show that the IVS is closely linked to the option-cash basis. Its predictability is consistent with the model of Hazelkorn, Moskowitz, and Vasudevan (2023), where the option-cash basis reflects liquidity demand common to both options and underlying equity markets.

Can fully agentic AI nowcast stock returns? We deploy a state-of-the-art Large Language Model to evaluate the attractiveness of each Russell 1000 stock each trading day, starting in April 2025 when AI web interfaces enabled real-time search. Our data contribution is unique along three dimensions. First, the nowcasting framework is completely out-of-sample and free of look-ahead bias by construction: predictions are collected at the current edge of time, ensuring the AI has no knowledge of future outcomes. Second, this temporal design is irreproducible once the information environment passes. Third, our framework is fully agentic: we do not feed the model curated news or disclosures; it autonomously searches the web, filters sources, and synthesises information into quantitative predictions. We find that AI possesses genuine stock-selection ability, but that its predictive power is concentrated in identifying future winners. A daily value-weighted portfolio of the 20 highestranked stocks earns a Fama-French five-factor plus momentum alpha of 19.4 basis points and an annualised Sharpe ratio of 2.68 over April 2025–March 2026. The same portfolio accumulates roughly 49.0% cumulative return, versus 21.2% for the Russell 1000 benchmark. The strategy is economically implementable: the average bid-ask spread of the daily Top-20 portfolio is 1.79 basis points, less than 10% of gross daily alpha. However, the signal remains asymmetric. Bottom-ranked portfolios generally exhibit alphas close to zero, while the strongest predictive content sits in the extreme top ranks. Delayed-entry tests further show that predictability does not vanish after a single day; rather, the signal remains positive over a broad window of subsequent entry dates, consistent with slow information diffusion rather than a fleeting overnight anomaly.

This study applies large language models (LLMs) to measure technological links and examines its predictive power in the Chinese stock market. Using the BAAI General Embedding (BGE) model, we extract semantic information from patent textual data to construct the technological momentum measure. As a comparison, the measure based on traditional International Patent Classification (IPC) is also considered. Empirical analysis shows that both measures significantly predict stock returns and they capture complementary dimensions of technological links. Further investigation through stratified analysis reveals the critical role of investor inattention in explaining their differential performance: in stocks with low investor inattention, IPC-based measure loses its predictive power while BGE-based measure remains significant, indicating that straightforward information is fully priced in while complex semantic relationships require greater cognitive processing; in stocks with high investor inattention, both measures exhibit predictability, with BGE-based measure showing stronger effects. These findings support behavioral finance theories suggesting that complex information diffuses more slowly in markets, especially under significant cognitive constraints, and demonstrate LLMs’ advantage in uncovering subtle technological connections that traditional methods overlook.

While many studies document cross-stock predictability where returns of some stocks predict returns of other similar stocks, most evidence comes from US markets. Following Chen et al. (2019), we identify peer firms based on historical return similarity and construct a Peer Return Gap (PRG) measure, defined as the difference between a stock’s lagged return and its peers’ returns. Our empirical evidence from Chinese markets shows that past-return-linked peers strongly predict focal firm returns. A long-short portfolio sorted on PRG generates an equal-weighted monthly return of 1.26% (t = 3.81) and a Fama-French five-factor alpha of 1.10% (t = 2.86). These abnormal returns remain unexplained by several alternative factor models.

We examine the risk-return trade-off in market anomalies within the A-share market, showing that even decaying anomalies may proxy for latent risk factors. To balance forecast bias and variance, we integrate the 1/N and mean-variance frameworks, minimizing out-of-sample forecast error. Treating anomalies as tradable assets, we construct optimized long-short portfolios with strong performance: an average annualized Sharpe ratio of 1.56 and a certainty-equivalent return of 29.4% for a meanvariance investor. These premiums persist post-publication and are largely driven by liquidity risk exposures. Our results remain robust to market frictions, including shortsale constraints and transaction costs. We conclude that even decaying market anomalies may reflect priced risk premia rather than mere mispricing. This research provides practical guidance for academics and investors in return predictability and asset allocation, especially in the unique context of the Chinese A-share market.

We examine the risk-return trade-off in market anomalies within the A-share market, showing that even decaying anomalies may proxy for latent risk factors. To balance forecast bias and variance, we integrate the 1/N and mean-variance frameworks, minimizing out-of-sample forecast error. Treating anomalies as tradable assets, we construct optimized long-short portfolios with strong performance: an average annualized Sharpe ratio of 1.56 and a certainty-equivalent return of 29.4% for a mean-variance investor. These premiums persist post-publication and are largely driven by liquidity risk exposures. Our results remain robust to market frictions, including short-sale constraints and transaction costs. We conclude that even decaying market anomalies may reflect priced risk premia rather than mere mispricing. This research provides practical guidance for academics and investors in return predictability and asset allocation, especially in the unique context of the Chinese A-share market.

We introduce a deep visualization (DV) framework that turns conventional commodity data into images and extracts predictive signals via convolutional feature learning. Specifically, we encode futures price trajectories and the futures surface as images, then derive four deep‑visualization (DV) predictors, carry ($bs_{DV}$), basis momentum ($bm_{DV}$), momentum ($mom_{DV}$), and skewness ($sk_{DV}$), each of which consistently outperforms its traditional formula‑based counterpart in return predictability. By forming long–short portfolios in the top (bottom) quartile of each DV predictor, we build an image‑based four‑factor model that delivers significant alpha and better explains the cross‑section of commodity returns than existing benchmarks. Further evidence shows that the explanatory power of these image‑based factors is strongly linked to macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical risk. Our findings reveal that transforming conventional financial data into images and relying solely on image-derived features suffices to construct a sophisticated asset pricing model at least in commodity markets, pioneering the paradigm of image‑based asset pricing.

We leverage machine learning to introduce belief dispersion measures to distinguish different opinion (DO) and information asymmetry (IA). Our measures align with the human-based measure and relate to economic outcomes in a manner consistent with theoretical prediction: DO positively relates to trading volume and negatively linked to bid-ask spread, whereas IA shows the opposite effects. Moreover, IA negatively predicts the cross-section of stock returns, while DO positively predicts returns for underpriced stocks and negatively for overpriced ones. Our findings reconcile conflicting disagree-return relations in the literature and are consistent with Atmaz and Basak (2018)’s model. We also show that the return predictability of DO and IA stems from their unique economic rationales, underscoring that components of disagreement can influence market equilibrium via distinct mechanisms.

We construct a novel risk-based similarity peer network by applying machine learning techniques to extract a comprehensive set of disclosed risk factors from firms' annual reports. We find that a firm's future returns can be significantly predicted by the past returns of its risk-similar peers, even after excluding firms within the same industry. A long-short portfolio, formed based on the returns of these risk-similar peers, generates an alpha of 84 basis points per month. This return predictability is particularly pronounced for negative-return stocks and those with limited investor attention, suggesting that the effect is driven by slow information diffusion across firms with similar risk exposures. Our findings highlight that the risk factors disclosed in 10-K filings contain valuable information that is often overlooked by investors.

I conduct an exploratory study about the feasibility of factor timing in the Chinese stock market, covering 24 representative and well-identiffed risk factors in ten categories from the literature. The long-short portfolio of short-term reversal exhibits strong and statistically signiffcant out-of-sample predictability, which is robust across various models and all types of predictors. However, such results are not evident in the prediction of all other factors’ long-short portfolios, as well as all factors’ long-wing and short-wing portfolios. The high exposure to the market beta, together with the unpredictability of the market return, explains these failures to some degree. On the other hand, a simple investment strategy based on predicted returns of the reversal factor’s long-short portfolio obtains a signiffcant return three times higher than the simple buy-and-hold strategy in the sample period, with a signiffcant annualized 20.4% CH-3 alpha.