本文首先对过去几十年来实物期权方法应用研究进展进行了回顾和总结，并指出了目前在实物期权方法应用中经常出现的一些模糊概念和误用的问题。通过一些实例的分析和讨论，对现有的一些研究结论提出了质疑，指出：由于问题构模及参数定义上的差异，一些在金融期权中成立的定理，如期权价值随着波动率增加、无风险利率增大或期权期限延长时，是递增的这一规律对于实物期权的而言可能会失效。并以实物期权在企业R&D 投资项目中为例，对这一问题以及与之相关的实物期权构模和参数选择等问题进行了详细深入的讨论和分析。文章还在对Penning and Lint（1997）及Agliardi Elettra（2003）等人的结果扩展的基础上，给出了当波动率、无风险利率和期权持有成本为时变函数的条件下四种复合期权的解析解，并利用数值计算结果证实了作者的观点。 Abstract: This study first reviews the literature of real options research in the past decades, and points out the problem of obscure concepts and misuse of real option frequently appeared in the application fields. By analyzing and discussing some cases, the author put forward doubt on some research results, and indicate that because of the discrepancy of modeling and parameter definition, some theorems which true for financial options, such as the value of options will increase when the volatility and risk-free rate increase or expiration date suspension, will not true for the real options. Using the application of real options in firm’s R&D project as an example, the paper analyses and discusses the problem in detail how to applying real options from aspects of modeling, parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis correctly, etc. By extending the results of Penning and Lint (1997) as well as Agliardi Elettra (2003), a close-form solution for a generalized of the Geske formula is derived for four types compound real options: call on call, call on put, put on call, put on put in the case of time-dependent volatility and risk-free rate and option-holding cost. The author’s findings are proven by numerical results in the last.

为强化企业财务管理的成效，妥善管理外汇风险，并降低汇率波动所造成的不确定性，企业在面对不同的外汇变化时，需配合本身的外汇价位，采取适当的避险策略，并选择有效的避险工具，以达风险管理之成效。而如何在最短的时间内筛选与评估可行的避险工具与方法?判断其最大的风险与损失，并进一步执行该策略与工具，其事后的绩效又是如何?这是管理者所面临到的挑战。为达到最佳的避险效果，当其面对本外币汇率波动，企业决策者需要依据其公司自身的特性，合理运用远期外汇或金融期权等工具，建构一最适合本企业的避险策略。