The global AI inference market—reaching approximately $90–100 billion annually and growing at 18% CAGR—operates without organized exchange infrastructure. We document three market failures: resource misallocation (80% of China’s newly built compute capacity sits idle), price opacity (100-fold price dispersion across providers of equivalent quality), and unhedged risk exposure (85% of enterprises miss AI cost forecasts by more than 10%). Following the market design tradition of Roth [2002] and Budish et al. [2015], we propose the AI Service Right (ASR) as a transferable property right on AI compute and the AI Service Unit (ASU) as a quality-adjusted, cross-platform unit of account grounded in hedonic price theory [Rosen, 1974]. The ASU is modality-neutral: billing prices across text, image, video, and speech modalities are unified via eq-token conversion factors (κimg ≈ 2,667 eq-tokens per image; κvid ≈ 2,667 per second of video; κspc ≈ 7 per second of audio), and modality-appropriate benchmark sets (MMLU/HumanEval for language; FID/CLIP Score for image; FVD/CLIPSIM for video; MMBench for multimodal) supply the quality in dex via PCA. We design a hybrid secondary market architecture synthesizing mechanisms from four orthogonal market traditions: foreign exchange markets (cross-platform exchange rates and PPP-analog arbitrage via the ASU); equity markets (Central Limit Order Book, market making, clearing); electricity markets (Compute Locational Marginal Pricing for spatial scarcity signals); and decentralized finance (Automated Market Maker for long-tail liquidity). We establish nine formal propositions: bilateral trading is generically inefficient; Compute Locational Marginal Pricing decomposes nodal prices into system marginal cost, capacity congestion, and bandwidth premia; no-arbitrage equi librium holds with capital constraints (extending Shleifer and Vishny 1997); the ASR market Pareto-improves over bilateral trading; market prices are more in formative under ASR; the hybrid CLOB-AMM architecture weakly dominates either mechanism alone; platform adoption admits multiple equilibria with a coordination trap; financialization may improve or reduce price informativeness depending on speculator-hedger composition; and a hedonic micro-foundation justifies the ASU definition. Calibrated agent-based simulation (500 steps, 30 Monte Carlo runs) provides computational validation: the hybrid architecture reduces price dispersion by 90% relative to bilateral trading, and order-of-magnitude welfare estimates suggest enterprise procurement cost savings of 0.2–20% (net of ASR transaction costs; see Table 7) and potential TFP gains from compute reallocation of up to $29.9 billion annually. We propose a phased implementation roadmap from shadow ledger to full financialization, and we engage critically with the concern that financialization may not reduce intermediation costs [Philippon, 2015].

This paper constructs a call pressure index (CP) from China's SSE 50 ETF option market and finds a robust U-shaped nonlinear predictability for directional option returns as measured by log returns. The effect reflects that extreme call pressures—whether unusually low (reversal) or high (momentum)—contain information, while moderate levels are dominated by noise trading. Robustness checks using delta-hedged returns confirm that predictability stems primarily from directional exposure rather than volatility dynamics. The predictability is stronger in high-volatility and down-market states and survives controlling for implied skewness, variance risk premium, and other common predictors. A simple timing strategy based on rolling-window forecasts achieves a Sharpe ratio of 0.97, which further increases to 2.43 after applying a prediction threshold. A parsimonious volume-based indicator captures unique predictive information beyond complex proxies, offering a feasible path for emerging markets lacking proprietary order flow data.

暂无

This paper investigates whether firm-level freight activity captures corporate fundamentals and predicts stock returns. Using smartphone geolocation data of truck drivers from 2019 to 2024, we construct a novel freight growth index (FGI) to quantify firms’ freight activity in the Chinese stock market. We find that firms’ freight growth is strongly associated with current operating performance and predicts future stock returns. A long-short portfolio sorted on FGI generates significant risk-adjusted monthly returns ranging from 57 to 72 basis points. Further evidence suggests that freight growth forecasts earnings announcement returns and is more predictive for firms with low information transparency. Moreover, freight growth provides incremental information in predicting stock returns beyond analyst forecasts. Our findings highlight that firm-level freight activity contains novel insights into firm fundamentals and stock pricing.

Investors and forecasters often extrapolate from past returns, but whether this reffects behavioral bias or efficient information processing remains unclear. We address this questionby inferring Chinese mutual fund managers’ market expectations from textual analysis oftheir commentaries and linking them to portfolio choices and performance. Extrapola-tion is state-dependent: it is stronger when growth is above trend and idiosyncratic riskis relatively more important. It is associated with weaker market timing and strongerstock picking, leaving overall performance unchanged. Our findings support a rational-inattention model of expectation formation, in which managers shift scarce attentionbetween aggregate and stock-speciffc information as the relative importance of differentrisks change.

We investigate the stock market reaction in China to Trump’s tariff policy announcement on April 2, 2025. We find that the tariff policy reduced stock prices of Chinese firms except those in the agricultural sector. Large-cap stocks, value stocks, stocks of high profitability firms, and stocks of state-owned enterprises experienced smaller negative impacts. Stocks with higher institutional holdings by mutual funds and Social Security Funds exhibited higher resilience, possibly due to these investors' superior capability in selecting stocks and forecasting trade war risks. In contrast, stocks held by Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFII) did not exhibit such resilience.

This study examines the mean-reversion behavior of trading volume in China’s A-share market, with a focus on the speed at which abnormal surges dissipate. We compare two competing hypotheses: the stealth-trading hypothesis, where persistent volume reflects order-splitting by informed traders, and the informational-efficiency hypothesis, which interprets faster reversion as a sign of efficient information absorption. Using the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model, we estimate the reversion speed for over 3,000 stocks and link it to firm- and industry-level characteristics. We find that trading volume is strongly mean-reverting, with over 98% of stocks classified as stationary. The OU model forecasts reversion speed with less than 7% error. Faster reversion is associated with larger size, higher analyst coverage, lower volatility, and greater liquidity. Notably, reversion speed increased after the 2006 IFRS reform but declined following Stock Connect, suggesting that stock market policies can influence informational efficiency. Our OU-based methodology offers a simple, observable proxy for monitoring how quickly markets process information. These results position trading volume as a core variable in market microstructure research and policy evaluation.

This study investigates the mean-reversion behavior of trading volume, using China’s A-share market as a representative setting characterized by dispersed retail investors, frequent public disclosures, and active policy interventions. We compare two competing interpretations:the stealth-trading hypothesis, in which persistent volume reflects order-splitting by informed investors, and the informational efficiency hypothesis, which links faster volume reversion to more effective information processing. Using the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) model, we estimate reversion speeds for over 3,000 stocks and relate these to firm- and industry-level characteristics. We find that trading volume is broadly mean-reverting, with over 98% of stocks exhibiting stationarity. The OU model forecasts reversion speed with less than 7% error. Faster reversion is associated with larger firm size, greater analyst coverage, lower volatility, and higher liquidity. Notably, reversion speed increased after accounting reforms but declined following capital access liberalization, suggesting that regulatory policy can both enhance and impair informational efficiency. These findings position reversion speed as an observable proxy for market responsiveness and highlight trading volume as a central variable in empirical market microstructure research.

We document “foreign bias” in AI financial predictions, reversing the classic home bias. U.S.-based ChatGPT is systematically more optimistic than China-based DeepSeek about Chinese firms—in price predictions and directional forecasts—yet significantly less accurate. Evidence supports an information-availability mechanism: bias is strongest when U.S. media coverage of Chinese firms is limited and attenuates for cross-listed firms. Crucially, injecting Chinese news eliminates the prediction gap. Both models produce similar forecasts for U.S. firms, consistent with broader worldwide coverage. LLMs trained in different information environments can create divergent signals, with implications for investors and policymakers as AI increasingly intermediates global markets.

This study examines the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption on stock price crash risk using panel data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2001 to 2022. We find that higher levels of AI application significantly reduce crash risk, primarily by enhancing information transparency, easing financial constraints, and promoting innovation. Notably, AI improves transparency within supply chains by reducing information asymmetry between upstream and downstream firms, thereby enhancing information flow and reducing market frictions. Among AI types, machine learning proves most effective in lowering crash risk due to its data-processing and forecasting capabilities, while natural language processing and computer vision show weaker effects. The impact of AI is particularly pronounced in non-government-regulated industries and high-tech firms. Moreover, its risk-mitigating effect becomes increasingly significant over time. These results are robust to instrumental variable estimation and staggered difference-in-differences (DID) designs. These findings highlight the strategic role of AI in risk management and offer practical implications for firms and policymakers aiming to enhance transparency, financial resilience, and long-term value creation.