Overseas compliance management is crucial for multinationals to operate with high character, but existing research has paid little attention to emerging multinationals’ overseas misconduct. Focusing on different directions and the interaction of the institutional gap and aspiration gap, we conducted an empirical analysis of a sample of Chinese multinationals who engaged in outward direct investment from 2009 to 2021 and found that in the case of a negative institutional gap, there is a positive linear correlation between a positive/negative aspiration gap and overseas misconduct. In the case of apositive institutional gap, there is a U-shaped relationship between a positive aspiration gap and overseas misconduct, and an inverted U-shaped relationship between a negative aspiration gap and overseas misconduct. Research conclusions bridge the divergence of the institutional paradox and aspiration paradox, provide a nuanced understanding on overseas misconduct, and distinguish different situations to guide emerging multinationals to operate in compliance overseas.

We study how multinational companies may propagate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices through subsidiaries in foreign countries with stricter ESG policies. Using staggered regulatory changes in a host country’s ESG strictness as an exogenous shock, we find that multinational firms with subsidiaries in countries that increased ESG strictness would significantly increase their R&D investments, build more green inventions in domestic operations, and have higher ESG ratings. Cities with more multinationals exposed to foreign ESG regulatory changes experience a greater reduction in air pollutant emissions. Our results are consistent with the argument that multinationals promote and propagate ESG practices across countries, likely to sustain access to finance in a foreign country with high ESG standards.

The methods of tax avoidance in common used by the multinational company in China are discussed; the causes of the multinational corporation’s tax avoidance are analyzed. On one hand, some special tax treatment on the foreign investor should be canceled, and the rules of anti-avoidance of tax should be made in China but also the foreign tax management should be strengthened, the basic informational construction should be improved, And the government should improve the system of tax collection. On the other hand, the international exchange and corporation on ant-avoidance of tax should be developed; singing the bilateral and multilateral tax agreement may solve some problems of tax avoidance.