We investigate the impact of the geographic proximity of underwriters on bond characteristics by using corporate and enterprise bonds issued in China from 2009 to 2019. We find bonds underwritten by underwriters in close geographic proximity are associated with lower financing costs, longer maturity in high and medium credit rating firms, shorter maturity in low credit rating firms, and lower default risk. Further, we find substitution effects between the geographic proximity of underwriter and underwriter reputation, and also between the geographic proximity of underwriter and firm transparency on reducing the costs of bond financing; i.e., a better reputation of the underwriter or higher transparency of the firm will weaken geographical proximate underwriters’ effects. Our results are robust in subsamples when firms have different degrees of local government connections.

The paper estimates the primary market pricing efficiency of China’s IPO after the IPO reform in June 2009, based on the stochastic frontier analysis. The results show that IPO pricing is not fully effective, and discover the existence of “deliberate underpricing”. The average pricing efficiency of China's IPO has reached 0.85, which is close to the level of the mature capital market; To certain extent, we can say that the reform of China's IPO has achieved the initial success. We also found that earnings per share and price earnings ratio are the greatest influencing factors. And there is no underwriter reputation in China. For different markets, we disclosed that, IPO pricing efficiency values in Growth Enterprise Market and Small and Medium Enterprise Board are substantially higher than the Main Board market. The paper analyzes the causes, and then gives some suggestions for the reform of China's IPO.

With a sample of 504 IPO issuers over a period of 2002-2008 in China, this paper studies a previously ignored issue by examining the relationship between pre-IPO earnings management and underwriter reputation for issuers with different level of marketization. We document that underwriter reputation is negatively related to pre-IPO earnings management only if the issuer is highly marketized. Specifically, we find a significantly negative relationship between pre-IPO earnings management and underwriter reputation if the issuer is a non-state-owned enterprise (NSOE) issuer, a small-size issuer, or is listed on the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Board. No significant association is found for the state-owned enterprise (SOE) issuers, the large issuers, or Main Board issuers. We argue that the results are driven by the fact that issuers in the NSOE, small-sized, or SME market segment have more incentives to signal their earnings quality to avoid adverse selection by the investors, and/or reputable underwriters are more influential over their clients in mitigating earnings management.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the certification and monitoring roles played by underwriters in IPO earnings management. Prior studies show that IPO issuers have incentives to employ opportunistic earnings management to enhance initial firm values. However, the certification role of underwriters has been largely overlooked. We argue that there is a negative relation between underwriter reputation and IPO earnings management. Moreover, we think that underwriters have strong incentives to continue providing monitoring to the firms they take public due to the lucrative business relationships. We thus hypothesize that there is a positive relation between underwriter reputation and post-IPO firm operating performance. Using a sample of 367 IPOs, we obtain results consistent with our hypotheses. We find that IPOs underwritten by lower-reputation underwriters have more initial discretionary accruals and higher initial firm values, indicating there is a significantly negative relation between IPO earnings management and underwriter reputation. We also find that the post-IPO operating performance of IPOs is significantly and positively related to underwriter reputation. For the robustness test, we consider the possibility that IPO earnings management and the choice of underwriters are endogenously determined. An instrumental variable two-stage least squares regression and a weighted least squares regression confirm the robustness of our results.