We document a striking anomaly in international capital flows that we term "sanction arbitrage": U.S. investors exploited the 2014 sanctions on Russia by significantly increasing holdings in Russian equities while Rest-of-World (ROW) investors fled. We rationalize this behavior through a simple game-theoretic model where the sanctioning government faces a trade-off between geopolitical objectives and domestic welfare, effectively creating a protective shield for domestic investors and driving out ROW investors. Empirically, we confirm that pre-sanction U.S flows negatively predicted subsequent sanction designations. Consequently, U.S. investors internalized this protection to act as opportunistic buyers, absorbing fire-sale assets from exiting foreign investors and capturing significant excess returns from Russian stock holdings. These findings reveal that "smart" sanctions designed to preserve market access can inadvertently generate wealth transfers from foreign to domestic agents.

Can fully agentic AI nowcast stock returns? We deploy a state-of-the-art Large Language Model to evaluate the attractiveness of each Russell 1000 stock each trading day, starting in April 2025 when AI web interfaces enabled real-time search. Our data contribution is unique along three dimensions. First, the nowcasting framework is completely out-of-sample and free of look-ahead bias by construction: predictions are collected at the current edge of time, ensuring the AI has no knowledge of future outcomes. Second, this temporal design is irreproducible once the information environment passes. Third, our framework is fully agentic: we do not feed the model curated news or disclosures; it autonomously searches the web, filters sources, and synthesises information into quantitative predictions. We find that AI possesses genuine stock-selection ability, but that its predictive power is concentrated in identifying future winners. A daily value-weighted portfolio of the 20 highestranked stocks earns a Fama-French five-factor plus momentum alpha of 19.4 basis points and an annualised Sharpe ratio of 2.68 over April 2025–March 2026. The same portfolio accumulates roughly 49.0% cumulative return, versus 21.2% for the Russell 1000 benchmark. The strategy is economically implementable: the average bid-ask spread of the daily Top-20 portfolio is 1.79 basis points, less than 10% of gross daily alpha. However, the signal remains asymmetric. Bottom-ranked portfolios generally exhibit alphas close to zero, while the strongest predictive content sits in the extreme top ranks. Delayed-entry tests further show that predictability does not vanish after a single day; rather, the signal remains positive over a broad window of subsequent entry dates, consistent with slow information diffusion rather than a fleeting overnight anomaly.

The flow-performance relation in China’s mutual fund market differs from that in developed markets (e.g., the U.S.). We find that investors actively allocate capital to poorly performing funds, generating a negative relation at the bottom of return distribution. These flows are driven mainly by increased purchases rather than reduced redemptions. We then examine the mechanisms behind this anomaly. First, investors act on rational expectations of performance reversals, with this pattern being more pronounced among funds with higher activeness. Second, product differentiation attracts heterogeneous investors when performance is weak. Third, marketing and fund family effects serve as simple signals that amplify inflows. Overall, our study provides new empirical evidence on fund investor behavior and its economic consequences in an emerging market context.

This study identifies a significant settlement effect in China’s equity options market, where price decline and pre-settlement return momentum exists on the settlement Friday (T+2) due to a temporal misalignment between option expiration (T) and the T+1 trading rule for the underlying asset. We attribute this phenomenon to three distinct behavioral channels: closing pressure from put option unwinding, momentum-generating predatory trading by futures-spot arbitrageurs exploiting liquidity fragility, and an announcement effect that attenuates the anomaly by adjusting spot speculators' expectations. Robust empirical analysis identifies predatory trading as the primary driver of the settlement effect.These findings offer critical insights for market microstructure theory and the design of physically-delivered derivatives.

We utilize the Bayesian model scan approach to examine the best performing models in a set of 15 factors discovered in the literature, plus principal components (PCs) of anomalies unexplained by the initial factors in the Chinese A-share market. The Bayesian comparison of approximately eight million models shows that HML, MOM, IA, EG, PEAD, SMB, VMG,PMO, plus the four PCs, PC1, PC6, PC7, PC8 are the best supported specification in terms of marginal likelihoods and posterior model probabilities. We also find that the best model outperforms existing factor models in terms of pricing tests and out-of-sample Sharpe ratio.

Using comprehensive account-level data and 192 asset pricing anomaly signals, we investigate whether retail investors and institutions trade on anomalies in China. We find that retail investors tend to trade contrary to anomaly prescriptions, suggesting that they have a strong tendency to buy (sell) overvalued (undervalued) stocks. In contrast, institutions trade consistent with anomalies, indicating that they buy (sell) undervalued (overvalued) stocks. Regarding the information content of anomalies, we find that small retail investors trade contrary to trading-based anomalies, whereas institutions trade consistent with both trading- and accounting-based anomalies. Additionally, lottery stock preference and return extrapolation help explain investors’ trading behavior on anomalies.

The “Internet celebrity economy” is a business model aimed at capitalizing on online traffic based on the purchasing power of users on social media in which “influencers”—highly influential individuals—exercise their marketing power to create a fandom. China has witnessed an abrupt outbreak in its “Wanghong” (internet celebrity) economy since 2016, eventually leading to consecutive high closes for related stocks from around 2020. The empirical findings are as follows: First, investors’ attention to Wanghong stocks and cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) are significantly positively associated. However, operational results and CARs are weakly linked, implying that the economic impact of intense influencer marketing is short-lived, and abnormal returns constitute an anomaly. Second, the positive abnormal returns of Wanghong stocks last approximately six months, which overlaps with the boom period of the Wanghong index based on influencer news articles.

Using a comprehensive factor zoo, we document a notable factor MAX premium in the Chinese market. Factors with high maximum daily returns consistently outperform those with low maximum returns by 0.82% per month in the future, on a risk-adjusted basis. This premium remains robust controlling for various factor characteristics, and is not sensitive to the selection of factors. The factor MAX anomaly stands apart from lottery-type stock anomalies and contributes to elucidate most of these anomalies. The factor MAX premium concentrates in high-eigenvalue principal component factors, shedding light on the prevalent lottery preferences for factor investing in China’s A-share market. We document pronounced existence of factor MAX anomaly in the United States and other G7 countries.

Using a comprehensive factor zoo, we document a notable factor MAX premium in the Chinese market. Factors with high maximum daily returns consistently outperform those with low maximum returns by 0.82% per month in the future, on a risk-adjusted basis. This premium remains robust controlling for various factor characteristics, and is not sensitive to the selection of factors. The factor MAX anomaly stands apart from lottery-type stock anomalies and contributes to elucidate most of these anomalies. The factor MAX premium concentrates in high-eigenvalue principal component factors, shedding light on the prevalent lottery preferences for factor investing in China’s A-share market.

This paper studies the Level, Slope, and Curve factor model under different tests in the Chinese stock market. Empirical asset pricing tests reveal that the slope factor in the model represents either reversal or momentum effect for the Chinese stocks. Further tests on individual stocks demonstrate that the Level, Slope, and Curve model using effective predictor variables outperforms other common factor models, thus a filter in virtue of multiple hypothesis testing is designed to identify the effective predictor variables. In the filter models, the cross-section anomaly factors perform better than the time-series anomaly factors under different tests, and trading frictions, momentum, and growth categories are potential drivers of Chinese stock returns.