We examine effects of capital structure management and misvaluation on the payment method in mergers and acquisitions. In a sample of 3,097 transactions, we find evidence both for leverage optimization and misvaluation as drivers for the decision to pay with cash or stock. Our evidence also shows that it is difficult to pay with overvalued stock unless justified by economic fundamentals. Few bidders try and often only succeed after going hostile. Paying with cash while capital structure optimization suggests stock payment is more common. These firms are reluctant to pay with undervalued stock and experience positive long-term excess returns.

In the last decade hundreds of companies from emerging markets have listed and issued their shares on American and European stock markets. Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been the main origins of issuers, and stock exchanges in the US, UK, and Luxembourg the main destinations involved in the process. These four home and three host markets are the empirical focus of our paper. We present an economic geography perspective on foreign listing, grounded in the geography of finance and the world city network approaches, emphasising the sub-national origins of foreign listed firms, the role of intermediaries, and competition for foreign listings. Our analysis, based on comprehensive up-to-date datasets on foreign listings and foreign equity issues, shows that issuers listing their shares abroad are predominantly large firms, coming from relatively high-growth, internationally oriented sectors, and headquartered overwhelmingly in the leading economic centres of their home countries. Key intermediaries in the foreign listing process are the global investment banks, operating out of the very same centres where the cross-listing firms and the host stock exchanges are located. Competition between host stock markets is affected significantly by the direct and indirect costs of foreign listing, including disclosure and corporate governance requirements. Both host markets and intermediaries exhibit a significant degree of specialisation in terms of the size, sector, and geographical origin of the issuers they serve. The market for foreign listing differs significantly between the BRIC countries, with the Chinese market offering the greatest potential, but facing considerable uncertainty.

How corporate growth affects the choice between relationship-based debt and public debt remains an unsettled issue in the literature. For high-growth firms, the banking relationship mitigates asset-substitution and underinvestment problems due to debt financing. Close relationships, however, work against funding competition and facilitate holdup behavior by banks. This paper suggests an effective mechanism for high-growth firms, namely competition from equity, to curb banks’ rent extraction when public debt becomes more costly. According to the generalized Myers-Majluf view in the recent literature, new equity issues by high-growth firms actually reduce or even reverse the adverse-selection discount because asymmetric information about these firms’ valuations arise largely from growth rather than from assets-in-place. Our evidence from Japanese data for 1983 to 1997 shows that the relation between loan-to-debt ratio and growth, initially significantly negative, is indeed reversed toward the high end of growth spectrum and turns significantly positive. Consistent with our explanation, fast-growing high-flyers raise more new equity than do other firms. These results not only confirm the existence of both costs and benefits of monitored debt, but also explain why high-growth firms enjoy the benefits without fearing holdup behavior by banks.