This study examines the pricing effect of global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU) in the cross-section of individual stocks and portfolios in the Chinese stock market. Employing the GEPU index as a systematic risk factor, our empirical analysis demonstrates that stocks in the lowest decile of βGEPU generate risk-adjusted annualized returns that are 5.16% higher than those in the highest decile. Our analysis reveals that this βGEPU premium is driven by the outperformance of stocks with negative βGEPU and the underperformance of those with positive βGEPU. These findings suggest that uncertainty-averse investors not only demand compensation for holding stocks with negative βGEPU exposure but are also willing to pay a hedging premium for assets that serve as positive βGEPU hedges. The results prove robust across multiple specifications, persisting in both bivariate portfolio sorts and Fama-MacBeth cross-sectional regressions that control an extensive set of classic pricing factors.

Strengthening disclosure regulation and improving disclosure quality are central to China's transition to a full registration system and crucial for preventing capital market risks. Using prospectuses disclosed by IPOs on the STAR Market, ChiNext, and the Beijing Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023, this study constructs four textual indicators from prospectuses—length, sentence complexity, technical term density, and uncertainty—and examines how they affect resource allocation efficiency under the registration system. We find that text length and sentence complexity improve resource allocation efficiency, consistent with an information effectiveness effect. In contrast, technical term density and uncertainty reduce efficiency, reflecting information redundancy. Further analysis shows that the registration system reform enhances the comprehensiveness and complexity of disclosures, but its net effect on efficiency depends on the balance between information effectiveness and redundancy. This study contributes to the international literature on “institutional environment—disclosure—resource allocation” with evidence from an emerging market, while also extending theories of information asymmetry and impression management. Our findings support Chinese regulators in optimizing prospectus standards and strengthening review oversight, and provide policy insights for other emerging markets seeking to improve capital allocation through more effective disclosure design.

Economic policy uncertainty is a key determinant of exchange rate stability. This study investigates the impact of China's categorical economic policy uncertainties on the long-term correlation between onshore (CNY) and offshore (CNH) Renminbi (RMB) exchange rates. We find that fiscal policy uncertainty (FPU), monetary policy uncertainty (MPU), and exchange rate and capital account uncertainty (EXRPU) have a significant negative effect on this correlation, while trade policy uncertainty (TPU) has no significant impact. Furthermore, CNY and CNH do not effectively diversify risks and provide only limited hedging benefits.

Against the backdrop of recurrent global crises, economic uncertainty, and mounting environmental and social pressures, corporate resilience—defined as a firm’s capability to withstand external systemic shocks—has emerged as a critical determinant of long-term sustainability. This study empirically exames the effect of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance on corporate resilience in China’s A-share market, using the COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment to identify causal effects. The sample comprises 651 A-share listed firms, excluding financial institutions, real estate firms, and ST/*ST companies, over the period from January 20, 2020, when the pandemic was officially announced in China, to June 30, 2024. ESG performance is measured as the average of 2018–2019 ratings issued by three major domestic agencies, thereby capturing firms’ pre-shock conditions and mitigating concerns of reverse causality. Corporate resilience is evaluated along two dimensions: resistance, measured by the severity of losses in net income, revenue, and stock price, and recovery, measured by the time required for ROA, EBIT, stock price, and Tobin’s Q to return to pre-shock levels. To ensure the robustness of the findings, this study employs linear regression models with industry-clustered robust standard errors, an instrumental-variable approach using R&D intensity and analyst coverage as instruments, and a Cox accelerated failure time model to estimate recovery duration. The empirical results indicate that stronger pre-shock ESG performance significantly enhances corporate resistance and shortens recovery time. Mechanism analyses further reveal that ESG strengthens corporate resilience by improving total factor productivity, alleviating financing constraints, and enhancing corporate reputation. These findings remain robust to multicollinearity diagnostics and a range of additional robustness tests. Overall, this study provides empirical evidence of the value of ESG in strengthening corporate resilience and offers important implications for firms, policymakers, and investors.

This paper introduces reinforcement learning to examine the effect of trading on noise in a dynamic limit order market equilibrium. It shows that intensive noise liquidity provision (consumption) increases speculators' liquidity consumption (provision), improving (reducing) market liquidity. Channeled by uninformed chasing and informed aggressive liquidity provision, the increasing noise liquidity provision and consumption, respectively, improve price efficiency, generating a U-shaped price efficiency to the noise trading uncertainty on liquidity provision and consumption. Associated with a hump-shaped (U-shaped) profitability for the informed (uninformed) at a U-shaped noise trading cost in the noise trading uncertainty, this implies that, at increasing noise trading cost, intensive noise liquidity provision improves market liquidity, price efficiency, order profitability of informed traders, and reduces the loss, even makes profit, for uninformed traders.

We document a novel "news extrapolation" behavior among investors, which distorts the market reaction to corporate news. Specifically, investors tend to extrapolate the value of past news in the immediate reaction to the newly arrived news. News extrapolation generates a biased price reaction to news, which is completely reversed afterwards. Furthermore, the tendency of news extrapolation is related to the recency, consistency, and value uncertainty of news. Investors extrapolate not only from news of the same category but also from news of different categories. By analyzing the trading behavior and sentiment of different investor groups, we find that retail investors tend to be news extrapolators, while institutional investors trade against the news extrapolators.

This study examines how global turbulence factors shape volatility spillovers among emerging stock markets through the lens of risk cycles. We find that emerging market connectedness exhibits clear regime heterogeneity across risk cycles, while also preserving several persistent structural patterns. Specifically, trade policy uncertainty (TPU) and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) serve the dominant drivers during risk outbreak and risk accumulation periods, respectively. Meanwhile, sustainability uncertainty (ESGUI) consistently plays a leading driver role in both regimes, while physical climate risk plays a comparatively limited role. Furthermore, the effects of these core turbulence factors are nonlinear and threshold-dependent, highlighting the importance of accounting for risk cycle heterogeneity and nonlinear dynamics when assessing emerging market risk transmission.

Periods of market crisis are often accompanied by heightened fear and information overload, which can induce information avoidance behaviors such as the ostrich effect. While prior research has documented investors’ tendency to avoid unfavorable information, little is known about how different information sources—and trust in those sources—jointly shape such behavior under extreme uncertainty. Drawing on Granular Interaction Thinking Theory (GITT) and employing Bayesian Mindsponge Framework (BMF) analytics, this study examines how investors’ regular securities-related information sources is associated with the ostrich effect during the 2022 market downturn in China, and how these associations are conditioned by trust. Using survey data from 1,451 Chinese individual stock investors, we model investors’ recalled frequency of temporarily disengaging from stock investing as an indicator of information avoidance. The results show that regularly consulting professional sources, financial newspapers, and online forums is associated with information avoidance, whereas reliance on personal relationships and company disclosures is not. Importantly, trust moderates these relationships in distinct ways. Higher trust in professional sources is associated with reduced information avoidance, while higher trust in financial newspapers and online forums amplifies avoidance behavior. Among all sources, the interaction between trust and information referral is strongest for financial newspapers. These findings suggest that trust does not uniformly mitigate fear-driven avoidance. Instead, when combined with high-entropy information sources, trust can exacerbate cognitive and emotional strain, increasing investors’ propensity to disengage. By highlighting the joint roles of informational entropy and trust, this study advances behavioral finance research and offers practical insights for investors, policymakers, and regulators seeking to improve decision-making resilience during periods of market crisis.

In the Chinese context, the term “overseas” refers to countries and regions outside the sovereignty and jurisdiction of China. Overseas listing is an important strategy for firms to integrate into global capital markets and enhance their corporate investment efficiency. Using data from 600 Chinese companies listed exclusively overseas and 860 domestically listed firms for the period 2009–2023, this study analyzes the impact of overseas listing on corporate investment efficiency using empirical research methods, underlying mediating mechanisms, and the moderating role of economic policy uncertainty. The findings show that overseas listing improves Chinese firms’ investment efficiency. Compared to listing on the United States securities market (Nshares), listing on the Hong Kong securities market, (H-shares) has a pronounced effect on enhancing investment efficiency. Enhanced information disclosure quality improves the investment efficiency of Chinese enterprises listed overseas. Economic policyuncertainty can strengthen the positive impact of overseas listing on corporate investment efficiency. This study shows that overseas listing improves investment efficiency of firms in developing countries and offers new insights into advancing micro-level opening-up in these countries.

The governmental governance environment significantly influences real corporate investment. Based on the data of listed A-share enterprises from 2010-2020,we adopt a heterogeneous timing difference-in-differences method to examine the impact of Open government data (OGD) on real corporate investment by leveraging the launch of OGD platforms. It is found that OGD significantly promotes real corporate investment. This conclusion remains robust after a series of tests for robustness and endogeneity, including parallel trend, placebo, heterogeneity treatment effect, and replacing variable. The analysis of the impact mechanism reveals that OGD influences real corporate investment by reducing enterprise uncertainty and alleviating financing constraint. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that OGD exerts a more pronounced investment promotion effect on non-state-owned enterprises, without political affiliations, regions characterized by intense government intervention, and areas exhibiting low social trust. This study contributes both conceptual insights for advancing the real economy with higher quality and practical recommendations to support the modernization of national governance structures and administrative effectiveness.