We develop a signaling game model of investment to explore the effects of ambiguity aversion on corporate equilibrium strategies, investment dynamics, and financing decisions in incomplete markets with asymmetric information. Our analysis shows that volatility ambiguity aversion has a similar but more pronounced effect than asymmetric information, leading to higher financing costs, lower investment probabilities, and a greater likelihood of non-participation in investment. Importantly, volatility ambiguity aversion exhibits an amplifier effect, magnifying financing costs, adverse selection costs, and distortion in investment choices under asymmetric information. This increased ambiguity aversion raises the chances of inefficient separating and pooling equilibria, resulting in notable welfare losses. These findings highlight the significant impact of ambiguity aversion on strategic decision-making and equilibrium outcomes in investment, particularly in settings marked by information asymmetry and incomplete markets.

Peer-to-Peer lending platforms encourage borrowers to obtain various credit certificates for information disclosure. Using unique data from one of China's largest Peer-to-Peer platforms, we show that borrowers of lower credit quality obtain more certificates to boost their credit profiles, while higher-quality ones do not. Uninformed credulous lenders take these nearly costless certificates as a positive signal to guide their nvestments. Consequently, loans applied by borrowers with more credit certificates have higher funding success but worse repayment performance. Overall, we document credit certificates fail to accurately signal borrowers' qualities due to adverse selection, resulting in distorted credit allocation and investment inefficiency.

Using the introduction of margin trading in China, this study examines the effects of margin trading on the informativeness of trades and stock market liquidity. Using the methodology of Hasbrouck (1991 and 1993), I find that allowing investors to trade on margin leads to more informed trading. This increase in informed trading is mirrored by an increase in the adverse selection component of the bid-ask spread and a decrease in the relative weight placed on public information in trading decision. The discussed findings are more pronounced for stocks with relatively high levels of margin trading. Overall, the findings in the paper suggest that margin trading may lead to more information-based trading and lower levels of stock market liquidity.

This paper examines whether foreign investor heterogeneity plays a role in stock liquidity on a sample of 27,976 firms from 39 countries for the period from 2003 to 2009. Results show that foreign direct ownership is negatively, while foreign portfolio ownership is positively, associated with various measures of stock liquidity. Furthermore, liquidity also reduces more (less) in firms with larger foreign direct investment FDI (foreign portfolio investment, FPI) during the 2008 market downturn. As predicted by finance theory, foreign investors influence stock liquidity through both trading activity and information channels. Our findings also indicate that the presence of FDI investors improves firm valuation and operating performance even at the expense of an increase in the firm’s cost of capital, suggesting that the value-enhancing benefits from FDI investors’ monitoring efforts outweigh the liquidity costs and high adverse selection premium demanded by less informed investors. In contrast, the positive impacts of FPI ownership on firm performance, as previously documented in existing literature, becomes negative and also not robustly significant after controlling for liquidity.

With a sample of 504 IPO issuers over a period of 2002-2008 in China, this paper studies a previously ignored issue by examining the relationship between pre-IPO earnings management and underwriter reputation for issuers with different level of marketization. We document that underwriter reputation is negatively related to pre-IPO earnings management only if the issuer is highly marketized. Specifically, we find a significantly negative relationship between pre-IPO earnings management and underwriter reputation if the issuer is a non-state-owned enterprise (NSOE) issuer, a small-size issuer, or is listed on the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Board. No significant association is found for the state-owned enterprise (SOE) issuers, the large issuers, or Main Board issuers. We argue that the results are driven by the fact that issuers in the NSOE, small-sized, or SME market segment have more incentives to signal their earnings quality to avoid adverse selection by the investors, and/or reputable underwriters are more influential over their clients in mitigating earnings management.

We investigate the information cost of stock trading during the 2000 presidential election. We find that the uncertainty of the election induces information asymmetry of politically sensitive firms under the Bush/Gore platforms. The unusual delay in election results in a significant increase in the adverse selection component of trading cost of politically sensitive stocks. Cross-sectional variations in bid-ask spreads are significantly and positively related to changes in information cost, controlling for the effects of liquidity cost and stock characteristics. This empirical evidence is robust to different estimation methods.

We propose a model of project selection and design of managerial compensation contract that features adverse selection and moral hazard. Our model generates the rather intuitive result that the ex ante probability of a specific project being selected (or, equivalently, its manager being hired) is increasing in the type of the project/manager. Ex post, however, the most capable manager (i.e., the one with the highest type) is not necessarily the one who will be hired to run a project. Basically, when the managers’ types are not identically distributed, picking the most capable manager or selecting the most promising project may actually be inconsistent with the provision of optimal incentives to alleviate the inherent agency problems. Therefore, our model offers a rational explanation to the phenomenon that apparently more capable candidates are occasionally passed over in recruitment and job promotion situations. Our analysis also holds obvious implications for firms’ capital budgeting decisions. If the severity of the principal-agent conflict is sufficiently great (say, between the headquater and the divisional manager) and if the verification of the true project type (the NPV value) by the headquarter is sufficiently costly, we may well see instances where corporate headquarters rationally allocate scarce resources to a lower-NPV project ahead of a higher-NPV project.