本文基于互联网企业价值评估的背景，重点探讨一种常用估值方法——相对估值法（Relative Valuation），并以阿里巴巴集团（Alibaba）为实证对象首先，文章回顾了互联网企业估值的特殊性与挑战；其次，介绍了相对估值法的理论基础、常用指标（如市盈率P/E、市净率P/B、市销率P/S、EV/EBITDA 等）及其优缺点；再次，从互联网企业特征出发，分析该方法在阿里巴巴所处环境中的适用性及限制。然后，结合阿里巴巴最新财报数据（截至FY 2024 期）整理公司基本资料、选取可比公司、计算关键估值指标，进而得出对阿里巴巴的估值区间与市场价值对比。最后，基于实证结果，从估值结果合理性、影响因素（如业务结构、成长预期、市场情绪）以及方法优化建议三个维度展开讨论。研究发现：对于快速成长、业务多元的互联网企业而言，虽相对估值法具备便捷性与可比性优势，但也易受到可比公司选取不当、成长预期偏差及无形资产难以量化等影响。论文建议在实际应用中，应辅以折现模型（DCF）等方法，并注意调整估值倍率以反映公司成长性与风险特征。本文的研究可为互联网企业估值提供一种实务参考，也为资产评估的教学与研究提供新的案例视角。

China's tech companies are making waves with their recent achievements, including a "trifold" phone from Huawei and the revolutionary AI reasoning model from DeepSeek. Much discussion has centered on the founders of these companies and their ability to gain an edge on American rivals. But what is less appreciated or understood among foreign analysts of China’s tech giants is the role that innovation and transformation in corporate governance and organizational structure has played in these companies’ successes. Moreover, there are unique aspects of these companies from a corporate governance perspective that are not commonly seen in tech companies in other parts of the world or even within China itself. For instance, Huawei is 99% employee owned, while Alibaba is primarily governed by an "Alibaba Partnership." These unique corporate structures have arisen due to several factors, including the rapid changes to China’s regulatory landscape over the past three decades, distinct characteristics of Chinese business culture, geopolitical tensions and preoccupations with national security, and the “socialism with Chinese characteristics” model. In this article I overview some of the more distinctive corporate governance mechanisms of four Chinese tech companies: Huawei, Alibaba, Bytedance, and DeepSeek, and explain why these structures were adopted.