Retail investors are rising in prominence but have historically been granted little direct access to question corporate management relative to professionals like sell-side analysts and institutional investors. Because retail investors are relatively less sophisticated and can require hand-holding, we examine whether information asymmetry among investors decreases when firms answer questions from the retail investor base. We exploit ’s investor interactive platforms (IIPs), which were designed to facilitate retail investor access to management. IIPs allow questions to be anonymously and publicly posted, but answers can only pertain to previously disclosed information and there is no explicit penalty for low-quality answers. We find that IIP answers reduce bid-ask spreads, with stronger answer effects when managers respond quickly, provide direct answers, and interact with IIP users who focus on the firm. These information asymmetry reduction benefits are substantially attenuated, and in some cases non-existent, for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), who have less incentive to publicly engage with retail investors. Finally, our findings reveal that on average the marginal effects of answers are smaller than for posted questions, suggesting that while firms benefit from answering questions to lower investor integration costs, IIP activity that lowers awareness and acquisition costs is also important.

Researchers have recently studied the interactions between corporate and government bond issuances in a variety of countries. Some conclude that government bonds compete with private bond issuances, while others conclude the opposite. We study here the special case of China’s 2017 issuance of two sovereign bonds denominated in U.S. dollars. We find that corporate bonds experienced a decline in yield spreads, bid-ask spreads, and price volatility around the time this sovereign issuance was first announced. The results are particularly strong for corporate bonds with maturities similar to those of the USD sovereigns. We conclude that these new bonds served as useful reference instruments that helped investors price and hedge the risks impounded in Chinese corporate bonds.

China?s recent removal of short selling and margin trading bans on selected stocks enables testing of the relative effect of margin trading and short selling. We find the prices of the shortable stocks decrease, on average, relative to peer A-shares and cross-listed H-shares, suggesting that short selling dominates margin trading effects. However, there is negligible short sales activity and contrary to the regulators? intention, and recent empirical evidence, liquidity declines and bid-ask spreads increase in these shortable stocks. Consistent with Ausubel (1990), together these results imply uninformed-investors avoid these stocks to reduce the risk of trading with informed-investors.

China began allowing short selling and margin trading in 90 stocks in March 2010. This event provides an opportunity to test the relative effect of margin trading and short selling. We find the prices of these 90 stocks decrease, on average, relative to peer stocks in China and cross-listed H-shares, suggesting that short selling dominates margin trading effects. Contrary to the regulators? intention, and recent empirical evidence, liquidity declines in the shortable stocks. This may imply avoidance of these stocks by uninformed investors. There is also evidence of higher bid-ask spreads following the regulation change.

We investigate the information cost of stock trading during the 2000 presidential election. We find that the uncertainty of the election induces information asymmetry of politically sensitive firms under the Bush/Gore platforms. The unusual delay in election results in a significant increase in the adverse selection component of trading cost of politically sensitive stocks. Cross-sectional variations in bid-ask spreads are significantly and positively related to changes in information cost, controlling for the effects of liquidity cost and stock characteristics. This empirical evidence is robust to different estimation methods.