This paper analyzes the impact of risk disclosures in bond prospectuses on the credit risk premium in the Chinese corporate bond market through six textual characteristics comprehensively. In the empirical analysis, the collected 5199 bond prospectuses and structured data concerning control variables from 2006 to 2021 are used to perform the fixed effect regression analysis. The results show that fewer Words, less Boilerplate, higher Fog Index, more HardInfoMix, more Redundancy, and higher Specificity of risk disclosures in bond prospectuses will lead to a higher credit risk premium. Further tests demonstrate that ceteris paribus, the negative impact of Words and Boilerplate will be strengthened by implicit government guarantees carried by a state-owned enterprise but be weakened by better corporate business performance. However, ceteris paribus, positive effects of the Fog Index, HardInfoMix, Redundancy, and Specificity will be weakened when the bond issuer is state-owned but be strengthened by better corporate business performance.

In contrast to previous literature, our study not only examines the communicative value of Key Audit Matters (KAMs) through the capital market reaction to KAMs but also analyses the content and reporting format of KAMs, which vary based on the intrinsic risk of business activity. Using a sample of Chinese firms from 2017 to 2020, we find that more M&A-related KAMs are reported and they are disclosed through less boilerplate language when M&As are accompanied with the Performance Commitment contracts (PCs), an indicator as high possibility of overpayment during M&As thus inducing the high risk of the goodwill impairment and high litigation risk. Additionally, we find that the negative impact of PCs on boilerplate language is amplified when the benchmark in PCs is precisely achieved or when the firm has been sued in recent years. In other words, the disclosure of M&A-related KAMs is more tailored to the client firm when auditors observe a high risk for accountability. Consequently, capital market participants, as well as other recipients of auditing reports, such as regulators and analysts, perceive non-boilerplate M&A-related KAMs as informative for their decision-making process.