Climate change shocks pose a threat to the stability of the financial system. This study examines the influence of climate risks on systemic risk in the Chinese market by utilizing extreme risk spillover network. Moreover, we construct climate risk indices for physical risks (abnormal temperature), and transition risks (Climate Policy Uncertainty). We demonstrate a significant increase in systemic risk due to climate risks, which can be attributed, in part, to investor sentiment. Furthermore, institutional investors can mitigate the adverse impact of climate risks. Our findings suggest that policymakers and investors need to exercise greater vigilance in addressing climaterelated adverse effects.

This paper studies a novel channel through which climate risks affect households’ choices of risky asset allocation: a stringent climate change regulation elevates labor income risk for households employed by high-emission industries which in turn discourages households' financial risk-taking. Using staggered adoptions of climate change action plans across states, we find that climate change action plans lead to a reduction in the share of risky assets by 15% for households in high-emission industries. We also find a reduction in risky asset holdings after the stringent EPA regulation. These results are stronger with experiences of climate change-related disasters. Our study implies an unintended consequence of climate regulations for wealth inequality by discouraging low-wealth households' financial risk-taking.

China’s energy stocks are confronted with significant climate-related challenges. This paper aims to measure the daily climate transition risk in China by assessing the intensity of climate policies. The daily climate physical risk encountered by China’s renewable energy stocks is also measured based on the perspective of temperature change. Then, the partial linear function coefficient model is adopted to empirically investigate the non-linear impacts of climate transition risk and climate physical risk on the return and volatility of renewable energy stocks. The nonlinear moderating effect of climate transition risk is also involved. It is found that: (1) Between 2017 and 2022, the climate transition risk in China exhibited a persistent upward trend, while the climate policies during this period particularly emphasized energy conservation, atmospheric improvements, and carbon emissions reduction. Additionally, the climate physical risk level demonstrated a pattern consistent with a normal distribution. (2) There is a U-shaped nonlinear impact of climate physical risk on the return and volatility of renewable energy stocks. High climate physical risk could not only increase the return of renewable energy stocks but also lead to stock market volatility. (3) Climate transition risk exhibits a U-shaped effect on the return of renewable energy stocks, alongside an inverted U-shaped effect on their volatility. Notably, a high level of climate transition risk not only increases the return of renewable energy stocks but also serves to stabilize the renewable energy stock market. Moreover, the heightened risk associated with climate transition enhances the negative impact of oil price volatility on the yield of renewable energy stocks and, concurrently, leads to an increase in volatility.The strength of this moderating effect is directly correlated with the level of climate risk.

本文发现，股票回报与公司的气候变化暴露水平之间存在可预测的关系。投资者并没有充分利用公司的气候变化暴露信息；那些暴露水平更高的公司，未来的回报更低。基于此构建的多空组合，能产生0.5%的因子调整后回报。本文排除了对冲气候变化风险、碳风险定价以及对ESG风险的担心等一系列替代解释。本文发现，公众的气候变化意识在近期的提高，削弱了这种可预测关系的幅度。