In this paper, we investigate the availability of external finance for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private enterprises (PEs) across all manufacturing industries in China. Employing a disequilibrium model, we find that SOEs are generally less financially constrained than PEs, but the difference is of small magnitude and has been steadily declining over time. We also reveal a positive relation between the advantage of SOEs in accessing external funds and the level of SOE monopoly at the industry level. In general, while SOEs and PEs are equally constrained in competitive downstream industries, we find a significant comparative advantage in accessing external finance for SOEs in monopolized mid- and upstream industries. The policy implication is straightforward: to finance PEs better, the Chinese government should consider breaking the existing monopolies or near monopolies of SOEs in certain industries further, rather than encouraging banks to favor PEs in their lending.

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are widely regarded as a critical instrument for industrial consolidation and capacity rationalization. Utilizing a dataset of China’s major national and regional steel enterprises from 1998 to 2013, this study empirically evaluates the efficacy of M&A in resolving over1capacity. We document a striking heterogeneity in outcomes: while M&A generally alleviates overcapacity, this effect is exclusively driven by inter-provincial transactions; intra-provincial mergers show no significant impact. Mechanism analysis reveals that inter-provincial M&A facilitates the transfer of control rights, effectively insulating firms from local government intervention. In contrast, intra-provincial mergers are undermined by local intervention through mechanisms of "internal control" and "external defense." Furthermore, despite the reduction in capacity, we find that inter-provincial mergers suffer from incomplete post-merger integration. There is a persistent lack of governance coordination, and no convergence in capacity management performance is observed between the merging entities over time. These findings offer critical policy implications for mitigating local protectionism and enhancing integration efficiency to resolve industrial overcapacity.

This paper studies the role of the soft budget constraint in shaping firm dynamics and long-run economic growth. We develop a Schumpeterian model with two sectors: consumption and investment, and two types of firms: state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and privately owned enterprises (POEs). Within this framework, multi-product firms require fixed inputs of investment goods to operate — a resource that is also crucial for firm expansion, and the soft budget constraint allows subsidized firms to continue operating on loss-making product lines. This distortion raises the price of investment goods, suppresses firm dynamics, and dampens aggregate growth. To quantify the mechanism, the model is calibrated using Chinese firm-level data. Our quantitative exercise shows that eliminating the SOE soft budget constraint friction reduces the price of investment goods by 9.82 percent, increases the overall TFP growth rate by 0.12 percentage points, and generates a welfare gain of 4.94 percent.

Enhancing the performance of corporate green supply chain management (GSCM) represents a critical enabler for delivering on the central imperatives of the global low-carbon transition. Using panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2022, this study employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach to examine the impact of the Low-Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) policy on firms' GSCM performance. The results show that the LCCP policy significantly improves firms' GSCM performance, and this effect remains robust across a range of sensitivity tests. Mechanism analyses reveal that the policy operates primarily by stimulating green innovation and increasing investment in environmental protection equipment. Furthermore, financial constraints play a significant moderating role: the positive effect of the policy on GSCM performance is stronger when firms face fewer financing constraints. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effects are more pronounced among non-heavy-polluting enterprises, those located in resource-dependent cities, and ISO 14001-certified enterprises. This study provides novel micro-level evidence on the environmental governance effects of place-based climate policies, and offers key policy implications for scaling up low-carbon city pilots and promoting corporate supply chain decarbonization.

This study examines how emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) respond to cross-national diversity in environmental regulation. Prior research suggests that internationalization exposes EMNEs to diverse environmental standards and may facilitate regulatory learning, yet offers a limited understanding of the mechanisms through which such exposure translates into green innovation. Drawing on institutional theory, we argue that green innovation is particularly fostered when EMNEs operate across host countries whose environmental regulatory regimes are more stringent than those in the home country, and when such exposure varies across multiple host locations. We theorize that this form of environmental regulatory diversity creates learning pressures and legitimacy incentives that motivate EMNEs to upgrade their environmental capabilities through green innovation. Using panel data comprising 9,362 firm-year observations from 1,088 Chinese MNEs over the period 2008–2021, we find support for our arguments. We further show that these effects are contingent on organizational and institutional conditions, specifically top management teams’ technological expertise and the strength of intellectual property enforcement in home-country locations. These findings advance research on EMNE learning and sustainable innovation under complex global environmental governance.

We examine whether the characteristics of economically linked firms predict stock returns in the Chinese A-share market. We construct two peer-based signals: a peeraverage (PA) signal that aggregates the characteristics of fundamentally similar firms, and a peer-deviation (PD) signal that summarizes a firm’s characteristic deviations from industry-peer averages. PA captures shared fundamental information, whereas PD benchmarks a firm’s relative position against economically comparable peers. Portfolio sorts, factor-spanning tests, and Fama–MacBeth regressions reveal economically meaningful and statistically significant return predictability for both signals, with generally larger portfolio returns among non-state-owned enterprises. Both signals retain significant incremental predictive power after controlling for the full set of own-firm characteristics and flexible machine-learning forecasts based solely on these characteristics. Changes in both signals also predict future earnings, while return predictability is generally stronger among firms receiving less investor attention, consistent with limited-attention-induced underreaction. These findings highlight the distinct informational and benchmarking roles of economic networks and their predictive value beyond firms’ own characteristics.

With the development of China's economy, more and more Chinese enterprises are active on the world stage, and cross-border M&A is the most effective and fastest way for enterprises to go abroad and make overseas investments, and it is also an important path for globalization after the enterprises have reached a certain stage of growth. Compared to domestic M&A, cross-border M&A is a more complex economic activity, requiring more factors to be considered and greater risks to be taken, with the slightest misstep often leading to operational difficulties for the acquiring company. It is important to consider whether cross-border M&A can improve business performance, the factors that influence the performance of cross-border M&A, and how to improve the performance of enterprises in cross-border M&A. This study takes 100 cross-border M&A events of Chinese listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen during the period of 2017-2020 as a sample, and on the basis of reviewing the research results of cross-border M&A at home and abroad, combined with the characteristics of cross-border M&A of Chinese enterprises, from different perspectives, a number of financial indicators are selected to construct comprehensive performance evaluation indicators using factor analysis, and the preliminary analysis shows that after cross-border M&A, the companies with increased performance The preliminary analysis showed that the number of companies whose performance increased after cross-border M&A increased year by year. The impact of industry relevance and transaction equity on M&A performance is not significant; the ratio ofM&A amount to current assets negatively affects firm performance in the year of M&A. Finally, based on the empirical results, relevant policy recommendations are made to encourage better development of private enterprises and improving cross-border M&A performance.

This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in the market for corporate control using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2021. We construct a novel firm-level AI Index through textual analysis of annual reports and find that AI adoption significantly enhances both the likelihood of becoming an acquisition target and the valuation premiums commanded in M&A transactions. Specifically, a one-standard-deviation increase in the AI Index is associated with a significant increase in the probability of being acquired and higher deal premiums measured by price-to-earnings multiples. We identify two channels through which AI adoption creates value recognized by the M&A market: an efficiency channel, whereby AI reduces agency costs and improves profitability, and an innovation channel, evidenced by increased high-quality patent output. The persistence of these effects over time further suggests that AI adoption generates substantive improvements in firm fundamentals rather than serving as a transitory informational signal. Importantly, we document significant heterogeneity across ownership structures: the positive effects of AI adoption are substantially weaker for State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) than for non-SOEs. Our findings contribute to the literature on digital transformation and corporate finance by demonstrating that AI adoption serves as a value-relevant firm attribute that shapes outcomes in the market for corporate control.

The global AI inference market—reaching approximately $90–100 billion annually and growing at 18% CAGR—operates without organized exchange infrastructure. We document three market failures: resource misallocation (80% of China’s newly built compute capacity sits idle), price opacity (100-fold price dispersion across providers of equivalent quality), and unhedged risk exposure (85% of enterprises miss AI cost forecasts by more than 10%). Following the market design tradition of Roth [2002] and Budish et al. [2015], we propose the AI Service Right (ASR) as a transferable property right on AI compute and the AI Service Unit (ASU) as a quality-adjusted, cross-platform unit of account grounded in hedonic price theory [Rosen, 1974]. The ASU is modality-neutral: billing prices across text, image, video, and speech modalities are unified via eq-token conversion factors (κimg ≈ 2,667 eq-tokens per image; κvid ≈ 2,667 per second of video; κspc ≈ 7 per second of audio), and modality-appropriate benchmark sets (MMLU/HumanEval for language; FID/CLIP Score for image; FVD/CLIPSIM for video; MMBench for multimodal) supply the quality in dex via PCA. We design a hybrid secondary market architecture synthesizing mechanisms from four orthogonal market traditions: foreign exchange markets (cross-platform exchange rates and PPP-analog arbitrage via the ASU); equity markets (Central Limit Order Book, market making, clearing); electricity markets (Compute Locational Marginal Pricing for spatial scarcity signals); and decentralized finance (Automated Market Maker for long-tail liquidity). We establish nine formal propositions: bilateral trading is generically inefficient; Compute Locational Marginal Pricing decomposes nodal prices into system marginal cost, capacity congestion, and bandwidth premia; no-arbitrage equi librium holds with capital constraints (extending Shleifer and Vishny 1997); the ASR market Pareto-improves over bilateral trading; market prices are more in formative under ASR; the hybrid CLOB-AMM architecture weakly dominates either mechanism alone; platform adoption admits multiple equilibria with a coordination trap; financialization may improve or reduce price informativeness depending on speculator-hedger composition; and a hedonic micro-foundation justifies the ASU definition. Calibrated agent-based simulation (500 steps, 30 Monte Carlo runs) provides computational validation: the hybrid architecture reduces price dispersion by 90% relative to bilateral trading, and order-of-magnitude welfare estimates suggest enterprise procurement cost savings of 0.2–20% (net of ASR transaction costs; see Table 7) and potential TFP gains from compute reallocation of up to $29.9 billion annually. We propose a phased implementation roadmap from shadow ledger to full financialization, and we engage critically with the concern that financialization may not reduce intermediation costs [Philippon, 2015].

This paper studies whether financial technology (FinTech) changes loan contract design by reducing banks’ reliance on collateral in corporate lending. Using loan-level data on Chinese listed firms from 2007 to 2023 and exploiting the People’s Bank of China’s 2019 FinTech Development Plan as a quasi-natural experiment, we find that banks with stronger pre-policy FinTech capability significantly reduce secured lending after the policy shock. In the benchmark specification, the probability that a loan is secured falls by 1.64 percentage points, or about 2.7% relative to the baseline secured-loan share. The result is robust to alternative loan classifications, matching procedures, alternative measures of FinTech adoption, aggregated lending outcomes, and alternative inference procedures. The pattern is more pronounced among small and medium-sized enterprises, lower-tier branches, and branches located outside bank headquarters’ cities, where borrower information is likely to be more limited. Supplementary analyses are consistent with FinTech reducing banks’ information-production costs and suggest that technological proximity to FinTech-active peers may amplify the collateral-reducing effect. Overall, the evidence indicates that FinTech can enhance banks’ screening capacity and shift lending decisions away from reliance on asset-based guarantees toward information-based credit assessment.