We develop a theoretical model in which investors evaluate dual-listed stocks through the prospect theory value of their historical return distributions. When the prospect theory value (PTV) of A shares exceeds that of H-shares, the A-share price will be higher than the H-share price, generating a persistent equilibrium price premium despite identical fundamentals. Using Chinese A–H dual-listed firms, we find that the PTV difference positively explains the AH premium. A gain–loss decomposition shows that A-shares have higher PTV because their less negative loss contribution more than offsets their smaller gain contribution. Consistent with this result, loss aversion and value-function curvature exhibit stronger pricing relationships than probability weighting. Investor composition shapes the pricing influence of PTV. Our results also explain why the AH premium increased following deeper market integration, like the Shanghai–Hong Kong Stock Connect.

Whether risk aversion is time varying and countercyclical is central to modern asset pricing, yet evidence remains limited and is based mainly on experimental, survey, or aggregate stock market data. We provide individual-level evidence from 10 million Chinese auto insurance contracts from 2011 to 2017, estimating policyholders’ risk aversion from deductible choices. We find that risk aversion is time varying and countercyclical. The estimates are negatively related to lottery and stock trading, positively related to insurance sales and bond trading, and vary with psychological factors, including seasonal mood, “zodiac year,” and calendar events.

We investigate how the loss of informative salient signals in financial markets influences stock return volatility, using the 2024 intraday disclosure reform of the mainland China-Hong Kong Stock Connect program as a natural experiment. The reform eliminated the real-time disclosure of northbound capital (NC) flows on trading platforms, rendering NC trading information invisible to Chinese investors during market hours. We find that the removal of NC signals induces increased investor belief dispersion and intensifies informed trading, thereby amplifying intraday volatility in NC-eligible stocks. Moreover, this effect is more pronounced for stocks with higher investor attention, indicating that attentive investors suffer stronger anchor loss when NC signals disappear. In contrast, lottery-type stocks and stocks with alternative NC trading clues exhibit weaker volatility responses, since the presence of strong alternative signals reduces the effect of NC signal loss. These findings highlight the informational role of insightful salient signals in stabilizing stock returns.

Overwork intensity (OI) is a salient issue that directly affects employees’ motivation and productivity. By using a novel dataset of overwork intensity constructed from daily high-resolution nightlight satellite images, we examine whether overwork intensity is a priced risk in the cross-section of stock returns. We show that a zero-investment portfolio that buys the highest OI quintile stocks and shorts the lowest OI quintile stocks earns 0.495% returns per month. This result is robust when controlling for various well-known risk factors. We argue and empirically verify that profftability, corporate governance, investor sentiment and lottery preference are the potential channels that drive the result.

This paper examines how profits from mutual funds’ participation in initial public offerings (IPOs) shape fund performance, investor flows, and market stability in China. Using comprehensive fund–IPO matched data from 2016 to 2023, we decompose fund returns into an IPO-lottery component and residual performance. At the aggregate level, IPO allocations add 2.05% to annualized excess returns; net of IPOs, excess return is −0.35% per year. At the individual level, the contribution of IPO profits varies substantially across funds and is most pronounced among mid-sized funds, inflating perceived managerial skill. Funds with higher IPO-driven gains attract greater inflows despite the absence of performance persistence, leading to capital misallocation. At the market level, IPO-profit-induced trading (PIT) predicts short horizon price run-ups that dissipate and reverse over subsequent months, while raising both total and idiosyncratic volatility. Overall, IPO profits temporarily enhance reported performance but erode market stability by propagating non-fundamental shocks through secondary markets.

Using comprehensive account-level data and 192 asset pricing anomaly signals, we investigate whether retail investors and institutions trade on anomalies in China. We find that retail investors tend to trade contrary to anomaly prescriptions, suggesting that they have a strong tendency to buy (sell) overvalued (undervalued) stocks. In contrast, institutions trade consistent with anomalies, indicating that they buy (sell) undervalued (overvalued) stocks. Regarding the information content of anomalies, we find that small retail investors trade contrary to trading-based anomalies, whereas institutions trade consistent with both trading- and accounting-based anomalies. Additionally, lottery stock preference and return extrapolation help explain investors’ trading behavior on anomalies.

We examine ESG pricing in the Chinese stock market. The results show that holding stocks with high ESG scores does not provide investors with higher future excess returns. On the contrary, stocks with low ESG scores perform better. However, this negative ESG premium feature is robust only in small-cap stocks. As size increases, the negative ESG premium fades away and is characterized by a positive premium in larger stock subgroups. We further examine the source of the negative ESG premium in small-cap stocks. The results show that this negative premium can not be explained by firm characteristics, short-term reversal effects, and lottery characteristics of stocks, but is associated with ESG investors. Specifically, the higher the ESG score with more ESG investors in small-cap stocks, the lower the expected excess return of the stock. This result implies that firms may benefit from ESG performance and disclosure, while investors may suffer from ESG strategies. Based on the results, we remind investors that they should be cautious in using ESG indicators to guide their investment decisions.

This paper improves the expected return variable and the corresponding trend factor documented by Han, Zhou, and Zhu (2016) and reveals the incremental predictability of this novel expected return measure on stock returns in the Chinese stock market. Portfolio analyses and firm-level cross-sectional regressions indicate a significantly positive relation between the improved expected return and future returns. These results are robust to the short-, intermediate-, and long-term price trends and other derived expected returns. Our improved trend factor also outperforms all trend factors constructed by other expected returns. Additionally, we observe that lottery demand, capital states, return synchronicity, investor sentiment and information uncertainty can help explain the superior performance of the improved expected return measure in the Chinese stock market.

This paper shows that a New Year’s gambling preference of individual investors impacts prices and returns of assets with lottery features. January call options, especially the out-of-the-money calls, have higher retail demand and are the most expensive and actively traded. Lottery-type stocks outperform their counterparts in January but tend to underperform in other months. Retail sentiment is more bullish in lottery-type stocks in January than in other months. Furthermore, lottery-type Chinese stocks outperform in the Chinese New Year’s Month but not in January. This New Year effect pro- vides new insights into the broad phenomena related to the January effect.

Investors' previous experiences with a stock affect their willingness to repurchase it. Using Chinese investor-level brokerage data, we find that investors are less likely to repurchase stocks that have increased in value since they were sold. We then construct a novel measure of Regret to capture investors' repurchase regret and investigate its asset pricing implications. Stocks with higher Regret experience lower buying pressure from retail investors in the future, leading to lower future returns. In terms of economic magnitude, portfolios with low Regret generate 12% more annualized abnormal returns. Further analyses show that the pricing effect of Regret is more pronounced among lottery-like stocks and those in which investors have previously gained profit. The results are robust to alternative estimations.