While the popularity of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) has brought signiffcant proffts, legal practitioners have been exposed to unanswered legal concerns behind the frenzy of NFT transactions. Generally, such concerns include those related to the applicability of copyright to NFTs, the legal relationship between an NFT and the tokenized work, and the copyrights associated with the NFT in transactions. TTe Hangzhou Internet Court released the ffrst NFT-related copyright case, setting a course for the subsequent judicial and business practice of IP-related NFTs nationally and internationally. With these general considerations in mind, the paper brieffy introduces what non-fungible tokens are and how they relate to copyright law. Speciffcally, by interpreting the ffrst NFT-related copyright decision in detail, the paper addresses the legal status of NFT and NFT transactions from the perspective of Chinese Copyright Law, with particular focus on the liability of online platforms and the applicability of the exhaustion doctrine.

We study how investor composition is related to future return, trading volume, and price volatility in the cross- section of the music-content non-fungible tokens (music NFTs). Our results show that the breadth of NFT ownership negatively predicts weekly collection-level median-price returns and trading counts. In contrast, ownership concentration and the fraction of small wallets are positive predictors. The fraction of large NFT wallets is a bearish signal for future collection floor-price returns. Investor composition measures have weak predictive power on price volatility. Further analysis indicates that an artist’s Spotify presence moderates the predictive power of investor composition for future NFT returns and trading volume, consistent with the notion that reducing information asymmetry helps improve price efficiency.

We study investors’ responses to increasing tax reporting awareness and scrutiny in the crypto markets. Using novel data on retail investors’ trading, we ocument significant taxation effects on investors’ behavior and preferences for crypto-exchanges. Investors engage in tax-loss harvesting through wash trading and trading new products such as non-fungible tokens, consistent with the motive to minimize taxable events, improve tax reporting quality, and balance portfolio losses. U.S.-based traders engage in more tax-loss harvesting at the end of the year than their international peers. We further examine billions of trades on the trading books of large crypto exchanges and discover widespread tax-loss harvesting trades on U.S.-based crypto exchanges, amounting to billions of dollars in tax revenue losses for the government. Finally, we discuss ongoing anti-tax-loss harvesting proposals in anticipation of traders’ likely reactions.