This study proposes an incentive alignment hypothesis of corporate spin-off activities, in which executive compensation contracts tie the interests of CEOs with those of shareholders and the reduction of agency problems enhances firm value through corporate spin-offs. Consistent with this hypothesis, CEOs with a high level of equitybased compensation are more likely to initiate a spin-off. The announcements of such corporate restructurings are reacted positively by the market. Firms engaging in spin-offs provide greater operating growth in the years following the restructurings compared with their size- and industry-matched control firms. Also consistent with this hypothesis, high incentive CEOs yield more personal gains by selling shares and exercising options following spin-offs.

This paper investigates the impact of ownership and ownership concentration on the performance of China’s listed firms. By recognizing the differences between ownership and ownership concentration and between total ownership concentration and tradable ownership concentration, we conduct simplex, interactive and joint analyses. We find that ownership concentration is approximately associated with higher firm performance. Ownership concentration is more powerful than any category of ownership in determining firm performance. Firm performance is better when the state is the largest of the top shareholders and/or institutions dominate ownership among the top tradable shareholders. Our results support the theory that high ownership concentration mitigates the agency problem.

Financing of and investing in R&D are prone to risks of appropriation by competitors, information asymmetry, and agency problems. Although legal protection of intellectual property (IP) rights at the national level is necessary to encourage investing in R&D, we show that the effective enforcement at the local level is also critical. We concentrate on the impact of provincial level IP rights enforcement on the financing of and investing in R&D, using a unique and rich sample of high technology firms. These firms are located in twenty-eight provinces/districts throughout China. The enforcement of IP rights differs at the provincial level, although the firms are under the same set of national and international laws. Controlling for provincial institutional factors such as economic development, banking system development, legal system performance, and local government corruption, we find that the enforcement of IP rights positively affects firms' ability to acquire new external debt (including formal and informal financing) and external equity. The firms in provinces with better enforcement of IP rights invest more funding in R&D, generate more patents, and produce more sales from new products. We also find better enforcement of IP rights helps mitigate the problem of appropriation by local partners in foreign and ethnic joint ventures. To deal with the problems of reverse causality and omitted common variables, we adopt the instrumental variable method and the approach used by Rajan and Zingales (1998), and the impact of IP rights enforcement is robust to different specifications. Our evidence confirms that enforcement of IP rights matters even in China. Furthermore, our results support that the enforcement of IP rights affects the growth in the economy via the channels of financing of and investing in R&D.

It is widely accepted that paying cash dividend might mitigate agency problem between majority shareholder and minority shareholders. Some common law countries use mandatory cash dividend policy to protect minority shareholders. We provide opposite evidence in this paper. First, we find that in China’s stock market, firms with intermediate or high shareholding concentration have higher incentive to pay cash dividend. As controlling shareholders in China hold non-negotiable shares, we argue that this phenomenon is associated with non-negotiable shareholders’ incentive to retrieve cash from the firm. Second, non-negotiable shareholders generally give up subscription right in rights offering. Furthermore, firms with intermediate or high shareholding concentration increase dividend payment soon after rights offering. Giving up subscription right and using receipts from rights offering to pay cash dividend together mean that non-negotiable shareholders in firms with intermediate or high shareholding concentration sell a proportion of the shares they hold to negotiable shareholders by paying cash dividend. The average selling price is about 3 times higher than that in private negotiation. Market reacts negatively to cash dividend announcement of firms with intermediate or high shareholding concentration. Our findings show that dividend might be used as a vehicle of tunneling.

We propose a model of project selection and design of managerial compensation contract that features adverse selection and moral hazard. Our model generates the rather intuitive result that the ex ante probability of a specific project being selected (or, equivalently, its manager being hired) is increasing in the type of the project/manager. Ex post, however, the most capable manager (i.e., the one with the highest type) is not necessarily the one who will be hired to run a project. Basically, when the managers’ types are not identically distributed, picking the most capable manager or selecting the most promising project may actually be inconsistent with the provision of optimal incentives to alleviate the inherent agency problems. Therefore, our model offers a rational explanation to the phenomenon that apparently more capable candidates are occasionally passed over in recruitment and job promotion situations. Our analysis also holds obvious implications for firms’ capital budgeting decisions. If the severity of the principal-agent conflict is sufficiently great (say, between the headquater and the divisional manager) and if the verification of the true project type (the NPV value) by the headquarter is sufficiently costly, we may well see instances where corporate headquarters rationally allocate scarce resources to a lower-NPV project ahead of a higher-NPV project.