This paper examines whether mandatory ownership disclosure aligns incentives or distorts in-vestor beliefs. Using a sample of 1,436 Chinese equity-oriented mutual funds from 2012 to 2023,we find that higher managerial and senior ownership are significantly associated with larger in-flows, suggesting that investors treat ownership as a quality signal. However, we find no evidencethat ownership forecasts superior future returns or risk-adjusted alphas. Mechanism tests showthat the ownership-flow effect is much stronger in low-marketing funds and that managers increaseownership after weak flows, a countercyclical pattern inconsistent with overconfidence and consis-tent with strategic remedial signaling. Overall, ownership disclosure appears to operate primarilythrough investor perception rather than information about managerial ability, weakening the linkbetween capital allocation and true skill in the mutual fund industry.

This paper develops an autonomous framework for systematic factor investing via agentic AI. Rather than relying on sequential manual prompts, our approach operationalizes the model as a self-directed engine that endogenously formulates interpretable trading signals. To mitigate data snooping biases, this closed-loop system imposes strict empirical discipline through out-of-sample validation and economic rationale requirements. Applying this methodology to the U.S. equity market, we document that long-short portfolios formed on the simple linear combination of signals deliver an annualized Sharpe ratio of 2.75 and a return of 54.81%. Finally, our empirics demonstrate that self-evolving AI offers a scalable and interpretable paradigm.

We examine the information content of the call-put implied volatility spread (IVS) of Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF options. Empirically, the IVS significantly and negatively predicts future SSE50 ETF returns at both weekly and monthly horizons. This predictability is robust both in-sample and out-of-sample, which stands in contrast to prior evidence from the U.S. options market. We explore several potential explanations and show that the IVS is closely linked to the option-cash basis. Its predictability is consistent with the model of Hazelkorn, Moskowitz, and Vasudevan (2023), where the option-cash basis reflects liquidity demand common to both options and underlying equity markets.

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of excess returns specific to corporate bonds. We construct a measure of excess returns that uses synthetic Treasury securities with identical cash flows as benchmarks, thereby fully removing interest rate effects and isolating the component of returns specific to corporate bonds. Using a monthly sample from 2002 to 2024, we find that, in addition to being lower on average, the corporate-bond-specific excess return differs significantly in the cross section from both the standard excess return based on T-bills and the duration-adjusted return. We further examine the effects of a broad set of bond-level characteristics and systematic risk factors on bond excess returns. Together, these findings provide a foundational benchmark for future research on corporate bond returns.

We document a striking anomaly in international capital flows that we term "sanction arbitrage": U.S. investors exploited the 2014 sanctions on Russia by significantly increasing holdings in Russian equities while Rest-of-World (ROW) investors fled. We rationalize this behavior through a simple game-theoretic model where the sanctioning government faces a trade-off between geopolitical objectives and domestic welfare, effectively creating a protective shield for domestic investors and driving out ROW investors. Empirically, we confirm that pre-sanction U.S flows negatively predicted subsequent sanction designations. Consequently, U.S. investors internalized this protection to act as opportunistic buyers, absorbing fire-sale assets from exiting foreign investors and capturing significant excess returns from Russian stock holdings. These findings reveal that "smart" sanctions designed to preserve market access can inadvertently generate wealth transfers from foreign to domestic agents.

We study asset demand and price formation in a two-asset rational expectations equilibrium with narrow thinking, where traders imperfectly coordinate decisions across assets under non-nested price information. When the price of one asset increases, cross-asset inference from prices reduces expected demand for the other asset, which feeds back into the demand response for the original asset. Narrow thinking weakens internal coordination and amplifies reliance on price-based inference. As a result, more severe narrow thinking leads to higher own-price elasticities. The model delivers sharp implications for market liquidity and price informativeness in the presence of bounded rationality.

Can fully agentic AI nowcast stock returns? We deploy a state-of-the-art Large Language Model to evaluate the attractiveness of each Russell 1000 stock each trading day, starting in April 2025 when AI web interfaces enabled real-time search. Our data contribution is unique along three dimensions. First, the nowcasting framework is completely out-of-sample and free of look-ahead bias by construction: predictions are collected at the current edge of time, ensuring the AI has no knowledge of future outcomes. Second, this temporal design is irreproducible once the information environment passes. Third, our framework is fully agentic: we do not feed the model curated news or disclosures; it autonomously searches the web, filters sources, and synthesises information into quantitative predictions. We find that AI possesses genuine stock-selection ability, but that its predictive power is concentrated in identifying future winners. A daily value-weighted portfolio of the 20 highestranked stocks earns a Fama-French five-factor plus momentum alpha of 19.4 basis points and an annualised Sharpe ratio of 2.68 over April 2025–March 2026. The same portfolio accumulates roughly 49.0% cumulative return, versus 21.2% for the Russell 1000 benchmark. The strategy is economically implementable: the average bid-ask spread of the daily Top-20 portfolio is 1.79 basis points, less than 10% of gross daily alpha. However, the signal remains asymmetric. Bottom-ranked portfolios generally exhibit alphas close to zero, while the strongest predictive content sits in the extreme top ranks. Delayed-entry tests further show that predictability does not vanish after a single day; rather, the signal remains positive over a broad window of subsequent entry dates, consistent with slow information diffusion rather than a fleeting overnight anomaly.

We document a novel "news extrapolation" behavior among investors, which distorts the market reaction to corporate news. Specifically, investors tend to extrapolate the value of past news in the immediate reaction to the newly arrived news. News extrapolation generates a biased price reaction to news, which is completely reversed afterwards. Furthermore, the tendency of news extrapolation is related to the recency, consistency, and value uncertainty of news. Investors extrapolate not only from news of the same category but also from news of different categories. By analyzing the trading behavior and sentiment of different investor groups, we find that retail investors tend to be news extrapolators, while institutional investors trade against the news extrapolators.

The Hurst exponent is a key parameter for characterizing the long memory of high-frequency time series. However, traditional estimators often exhibit systematic biases due to the influence of high-frequency endogenous noise and low-frequency trend shifts. Theoretical derivations show that endogenous noise contemporaneously correlated with the latent signal possesses a spectral density in the first-differenced series that is asymptotically equivalent to a squared sine functional form. Accordingly, the proposed estimator incorporates a corresponding spectral density component to fit the high-frequency error. Simultaneously, the model introduces a SCAD penalty term to control the low-frequency spectral divergence caused by structural breaks, thereby mitigating spurious long memory in parameter estimation. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the Penalized Mixture Whittle estimator yields smaller finite-sample biases and root mean square errors in scenarios involving both trend disturbances and endogenous noise. Empirical analysis shows that the estimates obtained using this method are robust to changes in sampling frequency. In further volatility forecasting experiments on commodity futures, the linear forecasting model constructed based on the parameter set achieves higher prediction accuracy than benchmark models such as HAR, as confirmed by the Diebold-Mariano test. This paper provides an effective econometric tool for high-frequency data inference in the presence of composite statistical disturbances.

The flow-performance relation in China’s mutual fund market differs from that in developed markets (e.g., the U.S.). We find that investors actively allocate capital to poorly performing funds, generating a negative relation at the bottom of return distribution. These flows are driven mainly by increased purchases rather than reduced redemptions. We then examine the mechanisms behind this anomaly. First, investors act on rational expectations of performance reversals, with this pattern being more pronounced among funds with higher activeness. Second, product differentiation attracts heterogeneous investors when performance is weak. Third, marketing and fund family effects serve as simple signals that amplify inflows. Overall, our study provides new empirical evidence on fund investor behavior and its economic consequences in an emerging market context.