Previous research finds that the greater geographic mobility of foreign than native-born workers following economic shocks helps to facilitate local labor market adjustment to shifting regional economic conditions. We examine the role that immigration may have played in enabling U.S. commuting zones to respond to manufacturing job loss caused by import competition from China. Although population headcounts of the foreign-born fell by more than those of the native-born in regions exposed to the China trade shock, the overall contribution of immigration to labor market adjustment in this episode was small. Because most U.S. immigrants arrived in the country after manufacturing regions were already mature, few took up jobs in industries that would later see increased import penetration from China. The foreign-born share of the working-age population in regions with high trade exposure was only three-fifths that in regions with low exposure. Immigration thus appears more likely to aid adjustment to cyclical shocks, in which job loss occurs in regions that had recent booms in hiring, rather than facilitating adjustment to secular regional decline, in which hiring booms occurred in the more distant past.

As a product of the integration of traditional finance and Internet technology, digital finance plays an important role in micro enterprise innovation and even macroeconomic development. Based on the data of China's A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2018, this paper explores the effect of the development of digital finance on enterprise innovation. The research finds that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the development of digital finance and enterprise innovation. Further research shows that this inverted U-shaped impact of digital finance is stronger on strategic innovation of enterprises, suggesting that enterprises pay more attention to the "quantity" rather than "quality" of innovation. Finally, the inflection point of the inverted U-shaped relationship is brought forward by the industry competition and media pressure. This paper not only enriches the research on the relationship between digital finance and enterprise innovation, but also provides a theoretical basis for the development of digital finance and the improvement of financial regulatory framework.

This paper investigates whether and how high-speed rail (HSR) construction affects local bank performance. Using the difference-in-difference method, we find that the city commercial banks (CCBs) significantly experience an overall decrease in ROA after HSR is introduced in the headquarters city. Mechanism analysis suggests that the HSR-driven city connectivity imposes the local CCBs on the intensified banking competition related to capital flows, and governance improvements associated with information flows. HSR exerts more pronounced impacts under higher financial liberalization. The findings are robust to the endogeneity concerns. We highlight the indispensable role of transport infrastructure in banking development.

The Property Rights Theory states that clearly defined ownership is the premise of efficiency, while ambiguous property rights result in great externalities. We use the establishment of local SASACs as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate how unifying the supervision rights and responsibilities internalizes externalities and enhances SOEs’ innovation. The primary results show that the total innovation outputs and high-quality innovation outputs of SOEs governed by local SASACs (i.e., treatment group) improve after creating SASACs. The mechanism analyses show that both the pyramids level and risk-bearing level of local SOEs increase. In cross-sectional tests, we unravel that the innovation improvement effect is subject to the following five factors, including SASACs’ independence, local government quality, industry competition, SOEs managers’ motivation for promotion, and whether the SOE is in high-tech industry. Our paper provides empirical evidence for evaluating the innovation effect of the establishment of local SASACs with a quasi-natural experiment when the public ownership of SOEs does not change. Chun

The existing literature studies the relationship between institutional investors and the risk of stock price crash from multiple dimensions. Based on the phenomenon that institutional investors hold the shares of several listed companies in the same industry, this paper takes the A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2008 to 2018 as the research samples to explore the relationship between institutional common ownership and stock price crash risk. The results show that: institutional common ownership significantly increases the risk of stock price crash. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion remains unchanged. The impact mechanism test shows that institutional common ownership improves the stock price synchronization, investor sentiment and stock liquidity, and then aggravates the risk of stock price crash. Further tests show that the higher the product market competition, the more media coverage, and the weaker the protection of regional investors, the positive impact of institutional common ownership on the risk of stock price crash is more significant.

This paper examines the health consequence of rising housing prices by exploiting spatial and temporal variation in housing price appreciation linked to individual-level health data in China from 2000 to 2011. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find robust evidence that increases in housing prices significantly raise the probability of residents having chronic diseases. This negative health impact is more pronounced among individuals from lowincome families and rural to urban migrants. Exploring various possible channels, we find that marriage culture and marriage market competition exacerbates the negative health effects, particularly for males and parents with young adult sons. Our results also reveal that housing price appreciation induces negative health consequences through increased work intensity, higher mental stress, and changes in lifestyle. This paper underlines the unintended health consequences of the real estate market prosperity.

Deregulation may increase bank stability. Employing China’s loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) reform in 2015, we show that the deregulation of the LDR increases the stability of banks. Specifically, the deregulation of the LDR alleviates banks’ deposit competition, and decreases reliance on customer deposit funding. By doing so, it improves the loan structure among banks with a high LDR, which, in turn, increases the on-balance-sheet stability of these banks. Meanwhile, the deregulation of the LDR curbs high-LDR banks’ impulse to issue principal-floating wealth management products, a form of shadow banking, which thus increases their off-balance-sheet stability.

In the context of technological competition and international trade, a country may attempt to influence a rival’s innovation efforts and use trade and innovation policies to gain at another’s expense. In a multi-country, multi-sector, dynamic model with endogenous technology accumulation through R&D innovation, we show that there is an additional incentive (beyond conventional terms of trade considerations) for Home to shift its demand for particular foreign goods and in turn affect foreign’s innovation efforts. We derive explicit expressions for optimal policies under an efficient baseline case, and general results for a wide range of specifications. In a dynamic setting, Ramsey optimal policies do not distort domestic R&D efforts if a country can commit to a schedule of trade policies, but time consistent policies employ both innovation and trade policies to implement the optimal foreign allocation, viewed from the Home country’s perspective.

We investigate banks' issuance choices of wealth management products (WMPs), which are both interest rate deregulation vehicles and shadow deposits without explicit government insurance. Support for an inverted-U shape between market share and WMP issuance is found in national market. State-owned banks are reluctant to issue WMPs due to their monopoly power, very small banks do not have the capacity to issue while small and medium banks issue WMPs intensively as a regulatory arbitrage. Moreover, the geographic deregulation in 2009 stimulates the bank competition in the local market, incumbent banks take advantage of WMPs to fight off the new entering banks.

We examine how sell-side equity analysts strategically disclose information of differing quality to the public versus the buy-side mutual fund managers to whom they are connected. We consider cases in which analysts recommend that the public buys a stock, but some fund managers sell it. We measure favor trading using mutual fund managers’ votes for analysts in a Chinese “star analyst” competition. We find that managers are more likely to vote for analysts who exhibit more “say-buy/whisper-sell” behavior with these managers. This suggests that analysts introduce noise in their public recommendations, making the more-precise information provided to their private clients more valuable. Analysts’ say-buy/whisper-sell behavior results in information asymmetry: the positive-recommendation stocks bought by the managers who vote for the analysts outperform the stocks sold by these managers after the recommendation dates. Our findings help explain several puzzles regarding analysts’ public recommendations.