Using proprietary data from China’s interbank bond-pledged repo market, we show that the interest-rate risk and credit risk of the pledged bond are key determinants of repo pricing. From a bond-option perspective, we develop arbitrage-free models that anchor the repo yield curve to the pledged-bond yield curve. The fair repo haircut is interpreted as the per-unit price of a call option on the pledged bond. We extend this framework to incorporate bail-in or bail-out potential, which enhances the model’s empirical performance and provides a novel explanation for systematic repo cheapness and existence of negative haircuts.

As China's bond market expands rapidly, the complexity of financial guarantee networks and their implications for credit risk have become critical issues in both academic research and financial practice. Utilizing micro-level data from China's credit bond market spanning 2014 to 2024, this study constructs a multi-layer network incorporating bonds, guarantors, and issuing firms to empirically examine the impact of guarantor network centrality on bond credit spreads. The results reveal a significant U-shaped relationship: moderate centrality reduces spreads by bolstering market confidence, whereas excessive centrality increases them due to heightened systemic risk. Mechanism analyses identify systemic risk and information asymmetry as key mediating channels through which centrality affects credit risk premiums. Heterogeneity tests indicate that this U-shaped pattern is more pronounced among state-owned guarantors, real estate firms, and high-risk clusters within the network. Furthermore, both cross-layer connectivity within the multi-layer structure and regional financial development levels significantly moderate the centrality-spread relationship. These findings offer a structural perspective on credit risk pricing in emerging markets and provide valuable policy insights for credit rating system design, guarantee regulation, and systemic risk prevention. International investors could also leverage these findings to better assess systemic risk in interconnected financial markets across emerging economies.

As companies and investors globalize, we are increasingly faced with estimation questions about the risk associated with this globalization. When investors invest in China Mobile, Infosys or Vale, they may be rewarded with higher returns, but they are also exposed to additional risk. When Siemens and Apple push for growth in Asia and Latin America, they clearly are exposed to the political and economic turmoil that often characterize these markets. In practical terms, how, if at all, should we adjust for this additional risk? We will begin the paper with an overview of overall country risk, its sources and measures. We will continue with a discussion of sovereign default risk and examine sovereign ratings and credit default swaps (CDS) as measures of that risk. We will extend that discussion to look at country risk from the perspective of equity investors, by looking at equity risk premiums for different countries and consequences for valuation. In the fourth section, we argue that a company’s exposure to country risk should not be determined by where it is incorporated and traded. By that measure, neither Coca Cola nor Nestle are exposed to country risk. Exposure to country risk should come from a company’s operations, making country risk a critical component of the valuation of almost every large multinational corporation. In the final section, we will also look at how to move across currencies in valuation and capital budgeting, and how to avoid mismatching errors.

Does digital financial inclusion alleviate poverty? This study investigates this question by integrating the Digital Financial Inclusion Index of Peking University with microdata from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) to examine how the expansion of digital financial inclusion affects household multidimensional poverty in China. Anchored in Amartya Sen ’ s capability approach and operationalized through the Alkire–Foster (A–F) framework, the study identifies multidimensional poverty across five key dimensions: income, health, education, insurance, and living standards. Probit models are employed to estimate how digital financial inclusion influences both the likelihood and structure of multidimensional poverty, while instrumental variable techniques are used to address potential endogeneity. Beyond the average effects, the study further explores the mechanisms through which digital financial inclusion contributes to poverty alleviation, focusing on three channels—promoting household consumption, increasing financial investment, and enhancing access to credit. The results reveal that digital financial inclusion significantly mitigates multidimensional poverty, particularly by improving income, living standards, and health outcomes, though its effects on education and insurance are limited. These findings underscore the transformative role of digital finance in fostering inclusive growth, suggesting that policies expanding digital financial infrastructure and literacy can amplify its poverty-reducing effects and advance equitable development.

This study investigates how the development of digital finance influences the geographical distribution of corporate supply chains using data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023. We examine whether digital finance enables firms to overcome traditional geographical constraints and adopt different supply chain distribution strategies. The analysis identifies two primary mechanisms through which digital finance influences supply chain geography: governance effects, which operate through enhanced risk management and information transparency, and financing effects, which function through alleviated capital constraints and trade credit provision. We further explore heterogeneous impacts across four dimensions: regional economic development, regional digital infrastructure, industry market competition, and enterprise lifecycle stages. By examining the geographical distribution of supply chains as an outcome of digital finance development, this study provides novel evidence on the micro-governance implications of digital finance. Our findings contribute to understanding how digital finance fundamentally changes the geographical constraints that have historically shaped supplier selection decisions and enables firms to develop more flexible supply chain configurations.

This paper examines how AI investment and data assets affect corporatecredit risk. Using Chinese listed firms, we construct four complementary measures ofAI investment, asset-based, labor-based, LLM-based, and text-based, and link them tofirms’ distance-to-default. We find that benchmark-level AI investment reduces defaultrisk, while excessive ffrm-speciffc investment increases it by eroding profitability andreffecting risk-taking and competitive pressure. The dominance of this adverse effectyields a negative overall relation between AI investment and credit risk. Cash flow riskis the transmission channel: benchmark-level AI improves cash ffow quality, whereasexcessive investment worsens it. High-quality data assets complement benchmark-levelAI by stabilizing cash ffow, but this benefit fades once investment becomes excessive.Overall, the impact of AI on credit risk depends on both investment intensity and dataquality, operating primarily through cash flow dynamics.

This paper investigates whether firms’ overtime intensity affects the cost of debt financing. Using satellite-based night-time light data for Chinese listed firms between 2013 and 2022, we construct an objective measure of weekday overtime that captures firms’ operational effort and capacity utilization. We find that higher overtime intensity is associated with significantly lower bond offering yield spreads. The effect is stronger among smaller, less-followed, less-profitable, and non-AAA-rated issuers, consistent with an information-asymmetry channel where investors rely more on observable operational behavior when hard information is weaker. The findings suggest that overtime functions as a priced form of soft information in debt markets, offering new evidence that real-time operational signals influence credit risk assessment.

Prevailing research, assuming developed financial markets, concludes that Chinese firms heavily rely on “short-term credit for long-term investment.”We challenge this view, arguing that China's vibrant informal financial system provides crucial alternative funding. Consequently, the severity of this maturity mismatch is likely overestimated. To investigate this, we examine strategic alliances as a representative informal institution. Our analysis confirms that such alliances significantly mitigate maturity mismatch, revealing that they enhance information sharing and reduce transaction costs. This provides initial evidence of informal institutions' critical role in addressing this issue. Given the prevalence of similar arrangements in China—like private lending and inter-corporate financing—our findings highlight the need to look beyond formal systems. This perspective not only recalibrates the understanding of corporate financing in China but also opens ample avenues for future research on informal finance's role in emerging economies.

We conduct a field experiment in China, o↵ering small business owners a conditional social media advertising subsidy. Beyond boosting business revenue and employment, the inter-vention significantly increases access to fintech credit: treated firms are more likely to open online stores and obtain online loans, while bank credit remains una↵ected. Our findings reveal a “fintech accelerator” mechanism—digital marketing drives sales growth that directly improves firms’ eligibility for fintech lending—demonstrating how targeted digital interven-tions can enhance financial inclusion and reshape credit allocation for small businesses.

This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of excess returns specific to corporate bonds. We construct a measure of excess returns that uses synthetic Treasury securities with identical cash flows as benchmarks, thereby fully removing interest rate effects and isolating the component of returns specific to corporate bonds. Using a monthly sample from 2002 to 2024, we find that, in addition to being lower on average, the corporate-bond-specific excess return differs significantly in the cross section from both the standard excess return based on T-bills and the duration-adjusted return. We further examine the effects of a broad set of bond-level characteristics and systematic risk factors on bond excess returns. Together, these findings provide a foundational benchmark for future research on corporate bond returns.