ESG is emerging as a new benchmark for measuring a company's sustainable development capabilities and social impact. As a measure of ESG performance, ESG ratings are increasingly receiving attention from companies, the general public, and government institutions, and are becoming an important reference factor influencing their decision-making. This paper investigates the impact of corporate ESG ratings on Total Factor Productivity (TFP) and its mechanisms of action. Focusing on listed companies in China, we find that higher ESG ratings contribute to improving a company's TFP, and this conclusion remains valid after robustness tests and addressing endogeneity issues. Further exploration into the reasons behind this result reveals that ESG ratings can be seen as a signal that a company sends to the outside world, representing its overall performance. Higher ESG ratings enhance a company's TFP by reducing market financing constraints and obtaining government subsidies. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the positive impact of ESG ratings on TFP is more pronounced for companies with higher levels of attention, reputation, and audit quality. Additionally, we explore whether ESG ratings can serve as a predictive indicator for measuring a company's TFP. This hypothesis was tested using machine learning algorithms, and the results indicate that models incorporating ESG rating indicators significantly improve the accuracy of predicting a company's TFP capabilities.

This paper proposes a new forecasting framework for the stock market that combines machine learning algorithms with several technical analyses. The paper considers three different algorithms: the Random Forests (RF), the Gradient-boosted Trees (GBT), and the Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and performs forecasting tasks and statistical arbitrage strategies. The portfolio weight optimization strategy is also proposed to capture the model's return and risk information from output probabilities. The paper then uses the stock data in the Chinese A-share market from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and observes that all three machine learning models achieve significant returns in the Chinese stock market. The DNN achieves an average daily return of 0.78% before transaction costs, outperforming the 0.58% of the RF and 0.48% of the GBT, far exceeding the general market level. The performance of the weighted portfolio based on the ESG score is also improved in all three machine learning strategies compared to the equally weighted portfolio. These results help bridge the gap between academic research and professional investments and offer practical implications for financial asset pricing modelling and corporate investment decisions.

Fintech firms mobilize information technology to provide intermediation services using a broker methodology, whereas dealer banks intermediate using leveraged balance sheets. The integration of Fintech into banking may reduce the unit cost of intermediation by shifting the production function from dealer to broker. A “Fintech score” is derived using nonlinear and machine learning algorithms that show on-balance sheet lending for low Fintech score dealer banks versus securitization, brokered deposits, and non-interest income for high score, broker banks. Using Data Envelopment and Stochastic Cost Frontier Analyses, we find that banks with higher Fintech scores are more operationally efficient and resilient in crises.