We investigate how the loss of informative salient signals in financial markets influences stock return volatility, using the 2024 intraday disclosure reform of the mainland China-Hong Kong Stock Connect program as a natural experiment. The reform eliminated the real-time disclosure of northbound capital (NC) flows on trading platforms, rendering NC trading information invisible to Chinese investors during market hours. We find that the removal of NC signals induces increased investor belief dispersion and intensifies informed trading, thereby amplifying intraday volatility in NC-eligible stocks. Moreover, this effect is more pronounced for stocks with higher investor attention, indicating that attentive investors suffer stronger anchor loss when NC signals disappear. In contrast, lottery-type stocks and stocks with alternative NC trading clues exhibit weaker volatility responses, since the presence of strong alternative signals reduces the effect of NC signal loss. These findings highlight the informational role of insightful salient signals in stabilizing stock returns.

How do global and domestic investors process institutional signals in emerging markets? We use China’s refined-oil pricing announcements as institutional communications to construct high-frequencymarketization surprises as deviations between actual prices and formula-implied expectations (2013–2025). Three heterogeneous patterns emerge. First, a 1% deviation toward weaker marketization triggers $30m equity and $10m bond outflows internationally while domestic futures appreciate. Second, Kalman filtering extracts latent institutional information differing across markets, with near-zero correlation. Third, international responses amplify quarterly while domestic dissipate immediately. A+H dual-listed firm analysis reveals implicit guarantees and market segmentation jointly drive this divergence.

This study aims to elucidate the behaviors of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges during extreme volatilities—China’s 2015 Stock Market Crash and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Using topological data analysis (TDA), the study identiffes early warning signals within the Shanghai–Hong Kong (SHHK) and Shenzhen–Hong Kong Stock (SZHK) -Stock Connect markets. This timeliness ensures proactive market stabilization and portfolio adjust-ments. The results also reveal that the interconnected market signals are more stable, supporting multidimensional crisis detection and offering valu-able tools for policymakers and investors to effectively mitigate ffnancial risks.

We document “foreign bias” in AI financial predictions, reversing the classic home bias. U.S.-based ChatGPT is systematically more optimistic than China-based DeepSeek about Chinese firms—in price predictions and directional forecasts—yet significantly less accurate. Evidence supports an information-availability mechanism: bias is strongest when U.S. media coverage of Chinese firms is limited and attenuates for cross-listed firms. Crucially, injecting Chinese news eliminates the prediction gap. Both models produce similar forecasts for U.S. firms, consistent with broader worldwide coverage. LLMs trained in different information environments can create divergent signals, with implications for investors and policymakers as AI increasingly intermediates global markets.

We study the role of superstition in China’s peer-to-peer lending market by ex-amining whether lenders time their bids according to “lucky hours” from the Chinese farmer’s calendar. Loans funded during lucky hours perform better—but only because the platform lists higher-rated loans at those times. This pattern is consistent with a screening mechanism: highly risk-averse lenders place greater value on both true risk reductions and auspicious-day signals, so the platform maximizes surplus by bundling the two—listing low-risk loans on auspicious days. Moreover, listing safer loans at lucky hours can further boost proffts because biased beliefs decay more slowly under asymmetric (bad-news-heavy) learning.

This study examines the evolution and spillover effects of informational efficiency across carbon markets following the launch of China ’s national carbon emissions trading system (NCET). Using a time-varying parameter VAR model, we analyze efficiency transmission among the National Carbon Emission Allowance (CEA), six China’s pilot markets, and the European Union Allowances (EUA). The results reveal substantial heterogeneity in efficiency dynamics. Since early 2023, the CEA and Shenzhen have shown improved efficiency and stability, while the EUA and other pilot markets have experienced declines in efficiency and increased volatility. Despite progress in domestic markets’ efficiency, the EUA remains the primary source of efficiency spillover effects, followed by the CEA, Shenzhen, and Beijing, whereas other pilot markets—particularly Shanghai—act mainly as net recipients. Spillover intensity increases significantly during major regulatory periods, especially around China’s annual “Two Sessions,” highlighting the influence of policy signals on market linkages. These findings offer empirical insights into the time-varying transmission of efficiency under institutional reform and inform the coordinated design of carbon trading policies.

We posit and demonstrate that, in China’s retail-dominated market, quantitative trading over-relies on non-fundamental signals, thereby crowding out fundamental information from stock prices and increasing crash risk. Using trading data from quantitative mutual funds and Chinese A-share firms during 2009-2023, we find that greater exposure to quantitative trading is associated with higher future crash risk. Mediation analysis further reveals that reduced information efficiency constitutes a key channel through which quantitative trading elevates crash risk. The effect is stronger for stocks with more retail investors, consistent with our proposed mechanism. Overall, we identify a novel potential risk of quantitative trading in underdeveloped emerging markets.

This paper investigates whether firms’ overtime intensity affects the cost of debt financing. Using satellite-based night-time light data for Chinese listed firms between 2013 and 2022, we construct an objective measure of weekday overtime that captures firms’ operational effort and capacity utilization. We find that higher overtime intensity is associated with significantly lower bond offering yield spreads. The effect is stronger among smaller, less-followed, less-profitable, and non-AAA-rated issuers, consistent with an information-asymmetry channel where investors rely more on observable operational behavior when hard information is weaker. The findings suggest that overtime functions as a priced form of soft information in debt markets, offering new evidence that real-time operational signals influence credit risk assessment.

This paper examines whether mandatory ownership disclosure aligns incentives or distorts in-vestor beliefs. Using a sample of 1,436 Chinese equity-oriented mutual funds from 2012 to 2023,we find that higher managerial and senior ownership are significantly associated with larger in-flows, suggesting that investors treat ownership as a quality signal. However, we find no evidencethat ownership forecasts superior future returns or risk-adjusted alphas. Mechanism tests showthat the ownership-flow effect is much stronger in low-marketing funds and that managers increaseownership after weak flows, a countercyclical pattern inconsistent with overconfidence and consis-tent with strategic remedial signaling. Overall, ownership disclosure appears to operate primarilythrough investor perception rather than information about managerial ability, weakening the linkbetween capital allocation and true skill in the mutual fund industry.

This paper develops an autonomous framework for systematic factor investing via agentic AI. Rather than relying on sequential manual prompts, our approach operationalizes the model as a self-directed engine that endogenously formulates interpretable trading signals. To mitigate data snooping biases, this closed-loop system imposes strict empirical discipline through out-of-sample validation and economic rationale requirements. Applying this methodology to the U.S. equity market, we document that long-short portfolios formed on the simple linear combination of signals deliver an annualized Sharpe ratio of 2.75 and a return of 54.81%. Finally, our empirics demonstrate that self-evolving AI offers a scalable and interpretable paradigm.