We investigate whether a firm’s decision on green bond issuances is influenced by the green bond issuances by other firms in the same industry. We find that a firm is significantly more likely to issue green bonds after observing that other firms in the same industry have previously issued green bonds. This effect cannot be explained by the issuer’s supplement to their previous issuances, incentive policies, and industry competition. Furthermore, we show that issuing green bonds can bring significant positive stock excess returns, which increases the motivation for institutional investors to learn and drive other firms in the same industry they hold to issue green bonds. Our findings indicate that the peer effect can be driven by social learning of the common ownership among firms and explain the reason for the rapid increase in green bond issuance.

We conducted a nationwide field experiment with 4,800+ Chinese-listed companies, randomly raising ESG concerns to their management teams via high-visibility and high-stakes online platforms. Tracking the full impact-generating process, we find that companies respond to our concerns by providing high-quality answers, publishing ESG reports, and making commitments to investors. Over time, Environmental (E) inquiries boost stock valuations, while Governance (G) concerns prompt skepticism. Productive and opaque firms are more likely to respond, consistent with a signaling model where costly ESG actions signal firm quality under information asymmetry. Overall, ESG actions are likely driven by profit-oriented signaling rather than values-based motives.

In this paper, we present a rational expectation equilibrium model in which fundamental and ESG traders hold heterogeneous valuations towards the risky asset. Trading occurs based on private information and price signal which is determined by a weighted combination of these diverse valuations. Our findings indicate that higher level of ESG rating disagreement increases ESG information uncertainty, thereby reducing trading intensity among ESG traders and attenuating the price informativeness about ESG. We further discover that allowing fundamental traders access to ESG information increases the coordination possibilities in the financial market, leading to multiple equilibria exhibiting characteristics of strategic substitutability and complementarity. Additionally, through measuring the ESG rating disparities among four prominent agencies in China, we deduce that ESG rating disagreement negatively impacts price informativeness by decreasing stock illiquidity.

This paper investigates how institutional investors’ site visits affect firm productivity by using a dataset of China’s A-share listed firms. The findings reveal that site visits have a constructive effect on firm productivity. Moreover, mechanism analysis indicates that reducing information asymmetry and improving stock price informativeness are two channels through which site visits influence firm productivity. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the nexus between site visits and firm productivity is more pronounced for non-state-owned firms and firms with intenser product market competition. Overall, this study brings new insights into the benefits of site visits and highlights the importance of investor activism.

Based on 5-minute high-frequency trading data, we examine the time-varying causal relationship between herding behavior and multiscale spillovers (return, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis) in the Chinese stock market. We employ the novel time-varying Granger causality test proposed by Shi et al. (2018), which is based on the recursive evolving algorithm developed by Phillips et al. (2015a, 2015b), to identify real-time causal relationships and capture possible changes in the causal direction. Our findings reveal a strong relationship between herding and spillover effects, particularly with odd-moment (return and skewness) spillovers. For most of the study period, a bidirectional causal relationship was found between herding and odd-moment spillovers. These results imply that herding behavior is a key driver of spillover effects, especially return and skewness spillovers, which are primarily transmitted through the information channel. By contrast, volatility and kurtosis spillovers are more strongly driven by real and financial linkages. Furthermore, spillover effects also affect herding behavior, highlighting the intricate feedback loop between investor behavior and risk transmission.

We examine the risk-return trade-off in market anomalies within the A-share market, showing that even decaying anomalies may proxy for latent risk factors. To balance forecast bias and variance, we integrate the 1/N and mean-variance frameworks, minimizing out-of-sample forecast error. Treating anomalies as tradable assets, we construct optimized long-short portfolios with strong performance: an average annualized Sharpe ratio of 1.56 and a certainty-equivalent return of 29.4% for a meanvariance investor. These premiums persist post-publication and are largely driven by liquidity risk exposures. Our results remain robust to market frictions, including shortsale constraints and transaction costs. We conclude that even decaying market anomalies may reflect priced risk premia rather than mere mispricing. This research provides practical guidance for academics and investors in return predictability and asset allocation, especially in the unique context of the Chinese A-share market.

In this study, we investigate whether and how risk disclosure in peer firms’ management discussion and analysis (MD&A) influences analyst earnings forecast accuracy. We find that peer MD&A risk disclosure significantly improves forecast accuracy, demonstrating a positive spillover effect. Moreover, the impact of peer MD&A risk disclosure on analysts’ forecast accuracy strengthens with the comparability and reliability of peer firms’ information, while weakens with the disclosure quality of the focal firm. Finally, peer MD&A risk disclosure also reduces stock price crash risk, providing further evidence that it improves information environment of the focal firm.

Previous studies on the impact of corporate information disclosure on stock price crash risk have largely focused on financial statements. In contrast, China’s unique monthly operating report disclosure system—featuring high frequency and realtime operational data—offers a distinct information channel. Using data from A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2021, we find that monthly operating report disclosures significantly reduce stock price crash risk by alleviating information asymmetry between firms and external stakeholders. The underlying mechanisms involve restraining managerial opportunism and correcting investor expectation biases. Further analysis shows that firms’ official responses to investor inquiries has no significant effect on crash risk once monthly operational disclosures are accounted for, underscoring that the quality of information disclosed is as important as its frequency. The risk-reducing effect is more pronounced among firms with greater business complexity, weaker internal controls, and lower institutional ownership.

This paper investigates how the geographical distribution of shareholders in Chinese mutual fund management companies influences investment decisions. We show that mutual funds are more inclined to hold and overweight stocks from regions where their shareholders are located, thus capitalizing on a local information advantage. By examining changes in fund holdings in response to shifts in the shareholder base, we rule out the possibility that these effects are driven by fund managers’ local biases. Our findings reveal that stocks from the same region as the fund’s shareholders tend to outperform and significantly contribute to the fund’s overall performance.

We investigate the relationship between the intensity of intraday return reversals and future stock returns in the Chinese stock market. We find that a high frequency of positive overnight returns followed by negative daytime returns predicts one-month ahead returns positively. The analysis shows that daytime retail investors tend to overly sell their own rising stocks at market open, accepting lower stock prices in exchange for liquidity. As the price pressure attenuates, these stocks experience subsequent price increases, implying a positive relationship between return reversals and future returns.