We study how mutual fund managers update beliefs and whether such updating reflects managerial skill. Using regulator-mandated, forward-looking investment outlook disclosures from Chinese mutual funds, we construct a novel measure of belief updating intensity based on year-over-year changes in stated beliefs, and further decompose these updates into macro and micro themes. We show that belief updating is strongly state contingent. During recessions, funds with more intensive updating shift their outlooks toward macroeconomic conditions, reduce procyclical stock exposures, and scale back on-site company visits, while the opposite pattern emerges in expansions. Belief-updating intensity positively predicts future performance, and this payoff is strongest when managers reweight beliefs in ways that align with prevailing economic conditions, indicating that belief updating captures an ex ante dimension of managerial skill. Consistent with a signaling interpretation, investors allocate more capital to funds with stronger belief updating, particularly when past returns are less informative.

In Chinese culture, the Zodiac Year (“Benmingnian”) is widely regarded as inauspicious, reflecting a deep-rooted superstition that shapes risk perception and decision-making. Using data on 2,194 Chinese listed firms between 2003 and 2022, this study investigates whether chairpersons’ Zodiac Year superstition affects outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) strategies. We find that firms pursue more conservative OFDI strategies during the chairperson’s Zodiac Year—diversifying across more projects while reducing the size of individual investments—consistent with heightened risk aversion. The effect is amplified under greater operational uncertainty but weakens in firms with stronger formal institutional constraints, such as state ownership or political connections. It also weakens in regions more deeply shaped by Confucian traditions—a rational informal institution that curbs superstitious tendencies—and varies systematically with managerial characteristics such as gender and education. Overall, the findings reveal how culturally embedded, nonrational beliefs shape strategic decision-making in international business.

This paper asks whether a personally experienced bubble crash leaves a lasting imprint on investment style. We study this in China’s stock market, where two technology-growth booms —the 2014–2015 Internet boom and the 2025–2026 AI hardware boom—share a similar narrative but are separated by a decade of generational turnover. Following managers across the mutual funds they run from 2013Q1 to 2026Q1, we compare those who lived through the 2015 crash with otherwise similar managers who entered afterwards. We find that the caution of veteran managers reflects a scar rather than a symptom of ageing. Conditional on age and career length, managers who lived through the 2015 crash hold more value exposure and chase technology stocks less when prices have been rising, and this reluctance deepens with how much the crash hurt them—crash-window tenure, performance shortfalls, redemption pressure—rather than with age. These demand differences reach asset prices as well: stocks held disproportionately by managers without bubble memories carry significantly higher subsequent left-tail risk, whereas crash-experienced ownership stabilises the stock, particularly when ownership is broad. Heterogeneous institutional beliefs rooted in career experience therefore shape not only how managers invest but also the crash risk of the assets they hold.

Households form beliefs by recalling past experiences, but recall is context dependent. Variation in contexts alone can therefore generate non-fundamental disagreement. A stylized model à la Wachter and Kahana (2024) illustrates this cognitive source of disagreement. When combined with salience-based frictions in memory encoding, context-dependent recall also generates testable predictions for belief skewness. Using weather as a contextual cue that triggers the recall of past shopping experiences, I construct a measure of memory-based household inflation disagreement in the U.S. and show that it explains survey-based disagreement, with stronger effects in unusual contexts, and predicts greater belief skewness. The memory effect is distinct from experience and mood effects and generalizes across countries and outcome domains. Finally, memory-based disagreement weakens monetary policy transmission by attenuating intended consumption responses.

This study develops a comprehensive methodological framework for identifying and quantifying investor echo chambers in online stock discussion forums. Motivated by a dynamic model of endogenous echo chamber formation, which formalizes how investors optimally allocate attention and update beliefs under cognitive and informational constraints, we construct a two-layer multiplex investor network that integrates common-attention similarity and semantic similarity to jointly capture the informational and cognitive linkages among investors. This framework enables the systematic examination of how shared information sources and convergent opinions emerge within investor communities. We compute both community-level and individual-level (node-level) echo-chamber intensity by integrating measures of social homophily, semantic reinforcement, and community insularity. At the firm level, we further aggregate these micro-level indicators using attention-weighted indices, community concentration (HHI), and semantic polarization metrics to characterize how echo-chamber dynamics manifest in firm-related discussions. In addition, we propose a general empirical panel framework to examine the relationship between investor echo-chamber intensity and firm-level outcomes. Overall, this paper provides a methodological foundation for the broader Investors’ Echo Chamber Project, offering scalable tools for network-based behavioral analysis and laying the groundwork for future research linking online social dynamics, financial market efficiency, and corporate decision-making.

We study the role of superstition in China’s peer-to-peer lending market by ex-amining whether lenders time their bids according to “lucky hours” from the Chinese farmer’s calendar. Loans funded during lucky hours perform better—but only because the platform lists higher-rated loans at those times. This pattern is consistent with a screening mechanism: highly risk-averse lenders place greater value on both true risk reductions and auspicious-day signals, so the platform maximizes surplus by bundling the two—listing low-risk loans on auspicious days. Moreover, listing safer loans at lucky hours can further boost proffts because biased beliefs decay more slowly under asymmetric (bad-news-heavy) learning.

This paper examines whether mandatory ownership disclosure aligns incentives or distorts in-vestor beliefs. Using a sample of 1,436 Chinese equity-oriented mutual funds from 2012 to 2023,we find that higher managerial and senior ownership are significantly associated with larger in-flows, suggesting that investors treat ownership as a quality signal. However, we find no evidencethat ownership forecasts superior future returns or risk-adjusted alphas. Mechanism tests showthat the ownership-flow effect is much stronger in low-marketing funds and that managers increaseownership after weak flows, a countercyclical pattern inconsistent with overconfidence and consis-tent with strategic remedial signaling. Overall, ownership disclosure appears to operate primarilythrough investor perception rather than information about managerial ability, weakening the linkbetween capital allocation and true skill in the mutual fund industry.

This paper studies how mutual fund managers update their beliefs as macroeconomic conditions change. Using regulator-mandated reports from Chinese mutual funds, we measure the intensity of belief updating from year-over-year changes in stated outlooks and decompose those updates into macro and micro themes. We show that belief updating is state-contingent: funds with more intensive belief updating shift their narratives toward macro (micro) topics during recessions (expansions) and concurrently reduce (increase) procyclical stock exposures and on-site company visits. This state-contingent belief updating predicts superior performance when matched to prevailing economic conditions, with macro-oriented updates paying off mainly for high-updating funds in recessions and micro-oriented updates paying off more broadly in expansions. Investors recognize this signal of skill, allocating greater flows to these funds, especially when past returns are less informative. Finally, belief updating is stronger for younger managers and for funds from newer, smaller families, consistent with signaling under career and competitive pressures.

We introduce a real-time dispersion measure based on cross-sectional stock returns explicitly designed to capture retail-driven speculative episodes. Elevated return dispersion effectively identifies periods characterized by intensified retail investor trading behaviors, driven by salience, diagnostic expectations, and extrapolative beliefs. During these high-dispersion states, momentum strategies collapse, and short-term reversals become dominant. Conditioning momentum strategies on our dispersion measure resolves the longstanding puzzle of missing momentum in retail-intensive markets such as China, substantially enhancing profitability. A dynamic rotation strategy between momentum and short-term reversal portfolios guided by dispersion states achieves annualized Sharpe ratios nearly double those of static approaches. Extending our analysis internationally, we employ Google search trends as proxies for retail investor attention, confirming that dispersion robustly predicts momentum and reversal returns globally. Our findings underscore the behavioral channel through which retail-driven speculation conditions momentum dynamics, providing clear implications for dynamic portfolio management strategies.

We examine how Chinese mutual funds react to superstitious beliefs about bad luck during one’s zodiac year, which occurs on a 12-year cycle around a person’s birth year. Funds decrease their holdings of zodiac stocks, non-state-owned enterprises in the zodiac years of their chairperson, and profit more from trading zodiac stocks than from trading other stocks. This pattern is more pronounced in firms with lower investor awareness and higher liquidity, and for fund managers with higher past ability, indicating that fund managers trade in anticipation of the negative market reaction towards zodiac stocks.