Financial repression—regulating interest rates below the laissez-faire equilibrium—has historically impeded investment in developing economies. In China, bank deposits were long subject to binding interest rate caps. Using transaction and local penetration data from a leading FinTech payment company, we study the FinTech’s introduction of a money market fund (MMF) with deposit-like withdrawal features but uncapped interest rates aids in interest rate liberalization. In aggregate, MMF assets grow rapidly, and banks whose deposit base was more exposed to the payment app see greater outflows. These outflows are concentrated in household demand deposits, for which the MMF is the closest substitute. Contrary to regulator concerns, exposed bank profitability does not decline. Rather, exposed banks invest more in financial innovation and are more likely to launch competing funds with similar features. Our results highlight how FinTech competition stimulates interest rate liberalization among traditional banks by introducing competition for funding.

This paper analyzes empirically what explains the low profitability of Chinese banks for the period 1997-2004. We find that better capitalized banks tend to be more profitable. The same is true for banks with a relatively larger share of deposits and for more X-efficient banks. In addition, a less concentrated banking system increases bank profitability, which basically reflects that the four state-owned commercial banks - China’s largest banks - have been the main drag for system’s profitability. We find the same negative influence for China’s development banks (so called Policy Banks), which are fully state-owned. Instead, more market oriented banks, such as joint-stock commercial banks, tend to be more profitable, which again points to the influence of government intervention in explaining bank performance in China. These findings should not come as a surprise for a banking system which has long been functioning as a mechanism for transferring huge savings to meet public policy goals.

Chinese commercial banks have experienced tremendous growth over the past decade but have received limited academic attention due to data collection difficulty. We’ve successfully compiled a hand-collected panel dataset of Chinese commercial banks governance characteristics from 1998 to 2007. We empirically examine the relation between board governance and the profitability of Chinese commercial banks. We find that board governance has significant impact on Chinese banks’ performance. Specifically, higher board ownership, lower percentage of insiders on board, and lower block ownership are associated with better bank performance. In addition, to improve bank performance, Chinese bank managers should also focus on effectively control of bank’s operating cost, increasing net interest margin, and closely monitoring loan productivity. This is the first study conducted on the efficacy of Chinese banks’ governance system and its relation with banks’ profitability. Empirical evidence from this study has important policy implications in reforming China’s banking system into a more transparent and more efficient market driven system.