Overwork intensity (OI) is a salient issue that directly affects employees’ motivation and productivity. By using a novel dataset of overwork intensity constructed from daily high-resolution nightlight satellite images, we examine whether overwork intensity is a priced risk in the cross-section of stock returns. We show that a zero-investment portfolio that buys the highest OI quintile stocks and shorts the lowest OI quintile stocks earns 0.495% returns per month. This result is robust when controlling for various well-known risk factors. We argue and empirically verify that profftability, corporate governance, investor sentiment and lottery preference are the potential channels that drive the result.

This study documents a novel, culturally embedded calendar anomaly in the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE Composite) derived from the Nayin (纳音) Five Elements system—a traditional Chinese sexagenary calendrical framework. Utilizing daily data from 1990 to 2025, the analysis reveals a significant correlation between elemental two-year periods and market performance. Key findings include: Earth-Element Dominance: Earth periods exhibit a 100% positive return rate (4/4) with a mean return of +123.4%. The effect size is substantial (Cohen’s d=1.50) compared to non-Earth periods. Metal-Element Declines: Metal periods universally display a structural peak-and-decline morphology, with an average −30.4% late-cycle decline. Water-Element Momentum: Water periods systematically mirror the directional momentum of their predecessors with 100% accuracy (3/3). These patterns fail to replicate in the S&P 500, suggesting a unique cultural-behavioral channel where traditional metaphysical cycles modulate investor sentiment in the Chinese market. This research provides the first empirical validation of Nayin-based cyclicality in financial asset pricing, offering a predictive framework for institutional and individual investors focused on the China-specific market. Keywords: Calendar anomaly, Chinese traditional calendar, Nayin Five Elements, Shanghai Composite Index, Cultural behavioral finance, Sexagenary Cycle, Market Sentiment Declaration of Interest The author declares no conflict of interest. To ensure the objectivity of this research, the author further declares that he holds no active personal trading positions in the securities discussed. The author's personal trading account has been inactive with zero transactions over the past five years.

Green bonds, pivotal to green finance, draw growing attention from scholars and investors. Social media’s proliferation has amplified the influence of investor sentiment, necessitating robust analysis of its market impact. However, general sentiment lexicons often fail to capture domain-specific slang and nuanced expressions unique to China’s bond market, leading to inaccuracies in sentiment analysis. Thus, this study constructs a specialized sentiment lexicon for the green bond market, namely the COBC (Chinese online bond comments sentiment lexicon), to dissect bond market slang and investor remarks. Compared to three general lexicons (Textbook, SnowNLP, and VADER), it improves the average prediction accuracy by approximately 87.2% in sentiment analysis of Chinese online language within the green bond domain. Sentiment scores derived from COBC-based dictionary analysis are systematically integrated as predictive features into a two-stage hybrid predictive model is proposed integrating Support Vector Machine (SVM), Auto-Regressive Moving Average (ARMA), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Networks (BiLSTM), and Attention Mechanisms to forecast China's green bond market, represented by the China Bond 45 Green Bond Index. First, ARMA-SVR is employed to extract residuals and statistical features from the green bond index. Then, the BiLSTM-Attention model is applied to assess the impact of investor sentiment on the index. Empirical results show that incorporating investor sentiment significantly enhances the predictive accuracy of the green bond index, achieving an average of 67.5% reduction in Mean Squared Error (MSE), and providing valuable insights for market participants and policymakers.

This study introduces an innovative approach for constructing multimodal investor sentiment indices and explores their varying impacts on stock market returns. We employ the RoBERTa model to quantify text-based sentiment, the Google Inception(v3) model for image-based sentiment measurement, and a multimodal semantic correlation fusion model to comprehensively consider the interplay between textual and visual sentiment features. These sentiment indices are further categorised into industry-specific investor sentiment and market-wide investor sentiment, enabling separate analyses of their effects on stock markets. Furthermore, we leverage these indices to build a multifactor stock selection model and timing strategies. Our research findings demonstrate that multimodal sentiment analysis yields superior predictive accuracy. Industry-specific investor sentiment exerts bidirectional positive influences on stock market returns, whereas market-wide investor sentiment indices exhibit unidirectional impacts. Integrating industry-specific investor sentiment into our multifactor stock selection model effectively enhances portfolio returns. Furthermore, combining market-wide investor sentiment with timing strategy optimisation further augments this advantage.

This paper examines the impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price delays in the context of the Chinese capital market. We find that ESG rating divergence significantly increases the stock price delays. Mechanism analysis results suggest that ESG rating divergence affects stock price delays by reducing information transparency and firm internal control quality. Heterogeneous analysis results indicate that the impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price delays is more pronounced in high-tech firms and when investor sentiment is high.

This paper improves the expected return variable and the corresponding trend factor documented by Han, Zhou, and Zhu (2016) and reveals the incremental predictability of this novel expected return measure on stock returns in the Chinese stock market. Portfolio analyses and firm-level cross-sectional regressions indicate a significantly positive relation between the improved expected return and future returns. These results are robust to the short-, intermediate-, and long-term price trends and other derived expected returns. Our improved trend factor also outperforms all trend factors constructed by other expected returns. Additionally, we observe that lottery demand, capital states, return synchronicity, investor sentiment and information uncertainty can help explain the superior performance of the improved expected return measure in the Chinese stock market.

Behavioral theories predict that firm valuation dispersion in the cross-section (‘‘dispersion’’) measures aggregate overpricing caused by investor overconfidence and should be negatively related to expected aggregate returns. This paper develops and tests these hypotheses. Consistent with the model predic- tions, I find that measures of dispersion are positively related to aggregate valuations, trading volume, idiosyncratic volatility, past market returns, and current and future investor sentiment indexes. Disper- sion is a strong negative predictor of subsequent short- and long-term market excess returns. Market beta is positively related to stock returns when the beginning-of-period dispersion is low and this rela- tionship reverses when initial dispersion is high. A simple forecast model based on dispersion signifi- cantly outperforms a naive model based on historical equity premium in out-of-sample tests and the predictability is stronger in economic downturns.

This study explores the role of sentiment in predicting future stock return volatility in the Chinese A-share market. Specifically, we conduct a composite sentiment index capturing both investor and manager sentiment. The former is measured by overnight returns, and the latter is measured by a textual tone based on the information in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of the annual reports. Empirically, we find that the composite index is positively associated with subsequent stock realized volatility and the result remains robust after controlling for a set of firm characteristics and state ownership. Besides, the result also shows that investor attention can help dissect the sentiment—volatility relation.

This paper improves the expected return variable and the corresponding trend factor documented by Han, Zhou, and Zhu (2016) and reveals the incremental predictability of this novel expected return measure on stock returns in the Chinese stock market. Portfolio analyses and ffrm-level cross-sectional regressions indicate a signiffcantly positive relation between the improved expected return and future returns. These results are robust to the short-, intermediate-, and long-term price trends and other derived expected returns. Our improved trend factor also outperforms all trend factors constructed by other expected returns. Additionally, we observe that lottery demand, capital states, return synchronicity, investor sentiment and information uncertainty can help explain the superior performance of the improved expected return measure in the Chinese stock market.

This study focuses on the relationship between individual stocks’ systemic tail risk and future returns. Analyzing data from China's A-share market, we document an abnormal negative crosssectional relationship between stocks’ systemic tail risk and returns, which cannot be explained by firm-specific characteristics. We show that the joint effect of investor expectation of stock return persistence and investor sentiment contributes to the systemic tail risk anomaly. Investors tend to underestimate the loss persistence of stocks that have suffered large losses in the most recent period and overprice such stocks, leading to a strong negative relationship between stock systemic tail risk and return. In addition, constraints on short selling exacerbate individual stocks’ systemic tail risk and also explain the systemic tail risk anomaly.