We develop a theoretical model in which investors evaluate dual-listed stocks through the prospect theory value of their historical return distributions. When the prospect theory value (PTV) of A shares exceeds that of H-shares, the A-share price will be higher than the H-share price, generating a persistent equilibrium price premium despite identical fundamentals. Using Chinese A–H dual-listed firms, we find that the PTV difference positively explains the AH premium. A gain–loss decomposition shows that A-shares have higher PTV because their less negative loss contribution more than offsets their smaller gain contribution. Consistent with this result, loss aversion and value-function curvature exhibit stronger pricing relationships than probability weighting. Investor composition shapes the pricing influence of PTV. Our results also explain why the AH premium increased following deeper market integration, like the Shanghai–Hong Kong Stock Connect.

This study investigates the relationship between the number of stock concepts and future returns, as well as the economic mechanisms underlying this association. Using novel collected data, we find that stocks with a greater number of concepts earn significantly higher returns in the subsequent month, generating a six-factor adjusted annualized alpha of approximately 9.6% for a long-short portfolio. Although these stocks exhibit higher turnover, return volatility, and investor attention - features commonly associated with speculative concept-driven trading - an analysis of cross-listed AH twin stocks reveals that concept counts do not widen the AH premium. Moreover, the return premium persists for up to 15 months without significant reversal, whereas firms that engage in opportunistic concept-chasing exhibit pronounced long-run reversals, suggesting that the positive concept-return relation is not driven by speculative motives. The higher returns are primarily attributable to strong industrial policy support and sustained above-expectation operating performance. Firms with more concepts are more likely to receive government subsidies and deliver positive earnings surprises, effects that are amplified when their core concepts receive stronger national policy backing. In contrast, firms that pursue concepts lacking substantive business relevance are significantly less likely to obtain government subsidies and fail to achieve above-expectation growth. Regarding investor composition, institutional ownership of high-concept stocks increases modestly, while ownership by government-guided funds rises substantially - particularly for stocks whose core concepts are strongly supported by national industrial policies. Conversely, concept-chasing behavior by listed firms significantly reduces the ownership ratio of government-guided funds. Overall, our findings indicate that concept stocks in China’s capital market are not purely speculative but signal underlying national policies.

We construct a text-based measure of war-related diplomatic sentiment from 154,185 foreignministry communications across the 15 largest world economies. The daily index tracks military escalations and ceasefires, varies across countries, and predicts newspaper-based geopolitical risk more than the reverse. Adverse Chinese rhetoric foreshadows stronger southbound reallocation into Hong Kong equities and weaker Stock Connect flows; a one-unit decline shifts daily flows by $42.4 million towards outflows, operating through a relative-price channel widening the AH premium rather than onshore declines. In monthly cross-country analyses, only the U.S. shows safe-haven behavior; adverse rhetoric raises Chinese and U.S. trading volume and U.S. volatility.