This paper examines the labor market consequences of nationwide pro-natalist policies and explores potential mitigating mechanisms. Leveraging China's relaxation of its decades-long One-Child Policy as a quasi-natural experiment, we show a 7.45% decrease in forecast accuracy among female analysts of reproductive age compared to their male counterparts. This motherhood penalty is more pronounced in provinces with stronger fertility norms and for firms that are more difficult to forecast. Moreover, we explore a broad set of potential remedies. Our results suggest that fostering a gender equality culture and expanding access to childcare resources that enhance family-career compatibility can mitigate this negative effect. In contrast, policies that focus primarily on extending maternity leave appear to exacerbate the productivity gap, likely due to the career interruptions that may erode their professional skills and connections. Ultimately, these productivity declines contribute to longer career gaps and higher attrition rates among female analysts, highlighting critical trade-offs between fertility-promoting policies and women's professional advancement.

As an emerging market, China's capital market is still developing, and stock mispricing due to information asymmetry is common. As the primary spokesperson for information disclosure, the Board Secretary plays a pivotal role in mitigating this issue. This study examines the impact of Board Secretary shareholding on stock mispricing using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2020. The findings show that shareholding significantly reduces mispricing. This effect is more pronounced in firms with lower media attention, suggesting it compensates for weak external monitoring. Furthermore, the reduction is primarily achieved by improving the quality of analyst forecasts. This research provides insights into mitigating mispricing and optimizing the governance of Board Secretaries.

We study how alternative data influences investors’information acquisition and market efficiency from both short-term and long-term perspectives. Using the exogenous introduction of online sales data on a major Chinese financial information platform, we find that such disclosure enhances investors’information processing capacity. In the short term, firms covered by online sales data exhibit weaker market reactions to unexpected earnings, reflecting more accurate earnings expectations. In the long term, online sales disclosure strengthens the link between earnings and stock returns, indicating higher earnings value relevance. These results are robust to a series of endogeneity tests and robustness checks. Cross-sectional analyses indicate that these effects are more pronounced for firms with lower institutional ownership, higher earnings volatility, and greater reliance on online sales. Mechanism analyses show that short-term effects operate through improved analyst forecast accuracy, while long-term effects are jointly driven by higher firms' earnings quality and enhanced analyst performance. These findings offer new perspectives on market efficiency and fresh evidence on investor information processing.

This paper investigates whether firm-level freight activity captures corporate fundamentals and predicts stock returns. Using smartphone geolocation data of truck drivers from 2019 to 2024, we construct a novel freight growth index (FGI) to quantify firms’ freight activity in the Chinese stock market. We find that firms’ freight growth is strongly associated with current operating performance and predicts future stock returns. A long-short portfolio sorted on FGI generates significant risk-adjusted monthly returns ranging from 57 to 72 basis points. Further evidence suggests that freight growth forecasts earnings announcement returns and is more predictive for firms with low information transparency. Moreover, freight growth provides incremental information in predicting stock returns beyond analyst forecasts. Our findings highlight that firm-level freight activity contains novel insights into firm fundamentals and stock pricing.

The value-relevance of accounting information is a cornerstone of capital market research, typically measured indirectly through coefficients and R2 values from returns-earnings models, which have limitations in explaining how accounting information influences stock prices. Based on the theory of financial analyst and the generating process of accounting information, we propose a direct measurement approach using analyst consensus earnings forecasts to capture the effect of accounting information on decision-making. We also construct firm-level measures of predictive and confirmatory value, two qualitative characteristics of accounting information defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Using data from the Chinese stock market, where analysts play a crucial role, we find that our measures significantly explain the relationship between accounting information and stock prices, as well as stock price synchronicity. Our study offers a novel and verifiable method to quantify the abstract concept of value-relevance of accounting information, enhancing the understanding of its effect on decision-making and stock prices.

This paper explores the impact of government intervention on local analysts’ earnings forecasts, based on a scenario of financial misconduct in Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The results show that, under the influence of the government, local analysts’ earnings forecasts for SOEs with financial misconduct are less accurate and more optimistically biased. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that forecast bias by local analysts is greater when officials have stronger promotion incentives, when regions are less market-oriented and have a larger share of the state-owned economy, and when SOEs contribute more to taxation and employment. In further analysis, we find that local analysts have a more optimistic tone in reports targeting non-compliant SOEs. Local analysts who depend heavily on political information will also issue more biased and optimistic forecasts on SOEs with violations. Finally, as a reward for achieving government goals, the local brokerages affiliated with these analysts and providing these optimistic forecasts are more likely to become underwriters in seasoned equity offerings of SOEs. This paper reveals that government intervention significantly influences analyst forecasts, providing implications for understanding the sources of analyst forecast bias.

This study investigates the impact of analysts' information source diversity on forecast bias and investment returns. We combine the GPT-4o model and text similarity, to extract the names of information sources from the text of analyst in-depth reports. Using 349,200 sources, we calculate information diversity scores based on the variety of data sources to measure analysts’ ability of selecting relevant information. The findings reveal that higher information diversity significantly reduces forecast bias and enhances portfolio returns. The effect is particularly pronounced for large companies, state-owned enterprises, those with low analyst coverage, low firm-specific experience, and reports with positive forecast revisions. Institutional investors recognize the value of this skill, while retail investors remain largely unaware, which contributes to financial inequality. This study highlights the critical role of information diversity in analyst performance.

We study how bank liberalization affects analyst forecast accuracy using two interest rate deregulations in China—the removal of the cap on bank lending rates in 2004 and the removal of the floor in 2013—as quasi-natural experiments. Our results show that the analyst forecast accuracy for high-risk firms decreases significantly after the removal of the lending rate cap, whereas analyst forecast accuracy for low-risk firms increases significantly after the removal of the lending rate floor. Moreover, interest rate liberalization affects forecast accuracy through operational risk and information asymmetry channels. Furthermore, the impact was concentrated on firms whose actual performance fell short of performance expectations and those that received more bank loans. Our findings imply that interest rate liberalization policies may have unintended consequences for analyst forecasts.

Using Chinese data, we find that analysts’ earnings forecasts are more accurate and less biased when analysts are socially connected with the company’s signatory auditor. We also find that forecast performance improves following mandatory auditor rotations that result in new analyst-auditor connections and declines following mandatory rotations that terminate existing connections. We further find that our results become stronger when the information that auditors possess is likely to be more useful to analysts, that connected analysts have better career outcomes than unconnected analysts, and that investors and other analysts are more responsive to forecast revisions issued by connected analysts. Finally, we find that connected auditors provide higher quality audits to their connected clients and are more likely to retain those clients. Overall, our findings are consistent with connected analysts benefitting from private information obtained from their social connections with auditors by providing better earnings forecasts, and in turn, with auditors benefitting from information they receive from connected analysts by delivering higher quality audits that improve client retention.

Purpose – Using a sample of 9,898 firm-year observations from 1,821 unique Chinese listed firms over the period from 2004 to 2019, this study aims to investigate whetherthe marketrewards meeting or beating analyst earnings expectations (MBE). Design/methodology/approach –The authors use an event study methodology to capture marketreactions to MBE. Findings – The authors document a stock return premium for beating analyst forecasts by a wide margin. However,there is no stock return premium forfirms that meet orjust beat analystforecasts, suggesting that the market is skeptical of earnings management by these firms. This market underreaction is more pronounced for firms with weak external monitoring. Further analysis shows that meeting or just beating analyst forecasts is indicative of superior future financial performance. The authors do not find firms using earnings management to meet or just beat analyst forecasts. Research limitations/implications – The authors provide evidence of market underreaction to meeting or just beating analyst forecasts, with the market’s over-skepticism of earnings management being a plausible mechanism for this phenomenon. Practical implications – The findings of this study are informative to researchers, market participants and regulators concerned about the impact of analysts and earnings management and interested in detecting and constraining managers’ earnings management. Originality/value – The authors provide new insights into how the market reacts to MBE by showing that the market appears to focus on using meeting or just beating analyst forecasts as an indicator of earnings management, while it does not detect managed MBE. Meeting or just beating analyst forecasts is commonly used as a proxy for earnings management in the literature. However, the findings suggest that it is a noisy proxy for earnings management.